FYI: THE ISRAELITES WERE NORDIC
One of the premier problems facing the Lightbearers is not merely “the darkness” they encounter everywhere, but the strong ramparts that invariably defend citadels of darkness. Knowledge is not precisely the enemy to the Lords of Darkness; it is true and correct knowledge in opposition to what is upheld by such Lords that is the enemy to be feared and combatted.
It is in the spirit of a Lightbearer that I offer the view that the israelites were a special and distinct group of people. I believe that their original appearance was distinctly different also. If, as I assert, the Israelites were a fair-complexioned people, bearing the usual traits of the people who became identified by the word, Caucasian, then this was not in vain.
I recall that in the ’70s, after Mr. Jenson had made a controversial paper on comparative intelligence available, Time magazine reported in an article that behavioral scientist were dis mayed tio discover that African American babies, or very young children, when presented the option of selecting either a brown baby-doll or a “white” baby-doll, selected the “white” baby-doll. Because of the extreme youth of the individuals, it was difficult to assert that they were “victims” of cultural bias, which is the usual claim in these matters.
My own belief is strictly-speaking “faith-informed.” I believe that the Adamic man was brought into the world to bring the pre-Adamic people into knowledge of the true God, Yahwey. When the Adamic man sinned, his mission was compromised to the extent that the Messiah must now accomplish the major work. However, the Adamic man still had the mission of “teacher” to perform. In my view the Adamic man became the primary agent of knowledge to the pre-Adamic man. In this way the Adamic man would help prepare the world for its Messiah.
The fact that the Adamic man was fair, or ruddy, in complexion is merely a device to draw the pre-Adamic people to such people. They were attracted to the “light,” as it were. Drawn willingly, willingly they learned, and in this process prepared the way for “Paradise Regained.”
What did the Adamic man look like? The name itself indicates someone capable of “blushing” or “flushing.” This indicates a thinner skin, as well as a fairer skin. For example, the term “blue-blood,” which presently connotes a royal or aristocratic lineage, was originally applied in Iberia to separate the Adamic Iberian from “imposters.” For even though the skin of fair people may darkened some under the light of the sun, the unexposed skin will still display the original, natural fairness. In the Adamic man the blood vessels, appearing to be blue under the fair skin, create a beautiful translucent marbling which was once prized. It is this characteristic which was noted by the term, “blue blood.” It is a racial characteristic, rather than a social strata.
Therefore, after the Flood, only Noah, his wife, and their children bore this Adamic signature. It is possible that Adamic man went eastward prior to the Flood, escaping its destruction but losing their original identity through amalgamation with pre-Adamic people over time. It was the Most High’s will that Noah and his family only would bear this mark into the future. As some of them proceeded in a southerly direction, in the persons of Eber, Shem, Mizraim, Canaan, et al, they brought the knowledge which had been acquired prior to the Flood event.
Incidentally, I don’t believe in a global flood, but a flood in the “world” of the fallen Adamic people–a world referenced by Peter in an epistle. Just as “America,” for the soldiers in Vietnam, was the “world,” so the “world” of the Flood was not literally the entire Earth. This is a view–not doctrine.
Have you ever wondered about the origins of the long, flowing clothing worn by Arabs and others? In east Africa the local populations wore rather scanty attire. They did not need protection from the sun, as the ample supply of melanin acted as “sun block” for their skin. The same situation applied in coastal India (and a far distance therein). However, for Adamic man the journey southward would increasingly mean exposure to intense sunlight. Further, the nights could be quite cool. I believe that Noah’s children developed this clothing to protect their fair and/or ruddy complexions from the burning sun. These flowing robes, et al, also served to keep them comfortable at night. Hence, the children of Noah may be credited with developing a pre-central cooling/heating system from textiles. Their attire stabilized the affects of weather in an important way. This is a view–not proven science.
Parenthetically, most scientist despise Bible-based concepts and Apochrypha, and therefore one may anticipate their asserting that such clothing was invented by Chinese or Hottentots.
What do we know of the descendants of Noah-Eber-Shem? What did they look like? We know that Abraham’s wife, Sarah, was described as as fair and very beautiful. King David was described as having “ruddy” complexion. As Abraham was a close relative of his wife, I believe it is a very good bet that he, too, was fair. Is this a “marker” of the Israelites? Consider:
“The most concrete evidence as to the ethnological characteristics of the true Israelites is to be found in the period c. 1400-900 B.C., and when they had been in occupation of the Promised Land for over 500 years. This evidence shows conclusively that the Israelites were of the Nordic type, a fact that has taken the scholarly world completely by surprise….It is evident that to the element of surprise, not a little confusion has been added, in that the predominating and almost sole type to be found in the lands of Israel’s settlement was Nordic, but has wrongly been called ‘Amorite’ by even the highest authorities on the subject.” (Emphasis added.) [UNCOVERING THE MYSTERIES OF YOUR HIDDEN INHERITANCE, Robert Alan Balaicius, Appendix C-5, p.171, citing ISRAEL'S MIGRATIONS OR AN ATTACK ANSWERED (1947), C.F. Parker, p.9]
In Scripture there are indications that Israel would be blind to its identification for a long period subsequent to its bondage in Assyria.. The great epistlist, Paul, even says that it was planned by the Most High, lest the Israelite Christians become vain and misguided. Under the tutelage of their clergy and academia, they have become so misguided as to be “blockheads,” suggesting that the Most High will cause them to suddenly develope perception at some point not too distant. If not, then we understand perfectly why Yahshua asked during His ministry if He’d find any faith at all at the time of His return. But consider:
” ‘Nowhere do we find that the Amorites predominated in all the land occupied by Israel in the time of…[Israel's] settlement. They [Amorites] were annihilated on the east of the Jordan [River] by Moses (Deut. ii 24-37).‘
“Parker continues, ‘The census figures of the Bible testify to the great strength and numerical superiority of…Israel…As Israel was at her greatest power under David and Solomon, and her internal enemies were subdued and in the minority, it is clear…the predominating type throughout the land of Israel was Israelitish, not Amorite as has [erroneously] been supposed. According to [Professor] Sayce and others, the predominating type in the land of Israel at the time of her greatest supremacy was Nordic; therefore, the Israelites were Nordic [and hence, the 'Amorites' were not Nordic].’ “ [Supra,pp.171-172, citing C.F. Parker, supra, p.10]
Unlike neighboring Edom, which always had a relatively small population, the population of Israel became immense. At the time of the Assyrian Bondage, the Northern Kingdom was populated by several million Israelites. A few hundred years later the Judahite historian, Josephus, proclaimed that the Northern Kingdom still resided north of Assyria in numbers beyond counting. Therefore, when the Israelites came to dominate the land once controlled by Canaanite tribes, it was a thorough domination, as opposed to being a ruling minority within a larger, alien people. Always, scientists and historians try to diminish these Israelite people. Why? Consciously or unconsciously, they are attempting to make the Israelites consistent with that known body of people, Jewry. Using their academic qualifications, they assert the right to put the facts and evidence on a Jewish-measured Procrustean Bed, lopping off anything that doesn’t fit, as obviously incorrect. folks, behold your intellectual leaders!
“Parker adds, ‘Foreign testimony in this respect is most valuable, in that it is impartial.’ He relates that during the time of Rehoboam (c.927 B.C.) the ruler of Egypt (Shishak) invaded Israel and took captives, recording these campaigns by inscribing them on the walls of the Egyptian temple at Karnak. These records reveal Israelites were taken captive from the cities of Gaza, Megiddo, Rabbati, Taanach, Shunem, Haphraim (of Issachar), Mahanaim (east of Jordan), Gibbeon (of Benjamin), Ajalon (Judah), Jehud (border of Dan), and other places (1 Kings 11:40; 14:25; II Chronicles 12:1).
“The time these Israelites were taken captive to Egypt was 200 years before the majority of Israel was taken captive to Assyria, and about 325 years before the remaining residue of the people of the land of Judah was taken to Babylon…
“Not only did the Egyptians meticulously record the details of their conquests in writing, but they also impressively recorded their campaigns by engraving in stone the profiles of the people they captured, thus identifying their racial type. Quoting Professor Sayce (from HIGHER CRITICISM AND THE MONUMENTS, 1894, pp.353-354), Parker records, ‘…The prisoners brought back to Egypt served as models, and the Egyptian artists drew their outlines with almost photographic fidelity. Now it is remarkable that the heads which surmount the names of Shishak’s…[captives from the land of Israel] are [called] ‘Amorites’….They [the Egyptian artists] reproduced the features of…[a] fair-skinned, light haired, blur-eyed and long-headed…race….It must have been the prevailing type. In no other way can we account for its having been selected by the sculptors of Shishak to typify the population of the Kingdom of Judah to the entire exclusion of any other type.’ ” [UNCOVERING THE MYSTERIES...,supra, p.172]
Now, Professor Sayce is a famous scholar, yet, even he thought that the “fairheaded” figures shown must represent Amorites. He was mistaken. This is a very fruitful lesson to learn when the Establishment attempts to do another academic “mugging” of the Israelites (not to be confused for Jews by lazy readers). But lets receive one more citation on this matter.
“Parker then concludes, ‘These are plain statements, yet the significance of them has been missed: it is that the latest findings of archaeology demonstrate conclusively that the Israelites (not Amorites) were Nordics.
” The accuracy of this conclusion is put beyond doubt when we discover…the Israelites obtained their Nordic characteristics from their ancestors the Hebrews, who were also Nordics, as is clear from the statements by Sir Leonard Woolley…in his excellent book [pp.291-292] ABRAHAM, RECENT DISCOVERIES AND HEBREW ORIGINS (1935):
” ‘c.2278. After the conquest of the Guti, Ur-Nammu, governor of Ur, sets himself up as king and establishes the Third Dynasty of Ur. The great imperial age of Ur is continued by Dungi (2260)…[to] Ibi-Sin (2195). During this time, the first appearance of Amorites (sic) [Israelites] amongst the population of southern Mesopotamia, these being probably the Habiru or Hebrew immigrants…’ “ [supra, Parker pp.12-13]
Although for some, Mr. Woolley may seem suggestive but not conclusive on this issue. Therefore, to strengthen the matter, consider:
“The Nordic people [erroneously called 'Amorite'] occupied exactly the territory of Israel, even to that [portion of land east of the Jordan River]–a fact which further confirms their identity as Israelites….Sayce identifies these people as similar to the ‘fair Kelts of an Irish village’; but he also traces them into Britain and Ireland! There is no break in the chain of evidence, and the accuracy of his identification is further established when he remarks [from his THE HITTITES (1925)]:”
” ‘Now it is curious that wherever this particular branch of the white race has extended it has been accompanied by a particular form of Cromlech, or sepulchral chamber built of large uncut stones….placed upright in the ground and covered over with other large slabs, the whole chamber being subsequently concealed under a tumulus of small stones or earth. Frequently the entrance to the cromlech is approached by a sort of corridor. These cromlechs are found in Britain, in France, in Spain, in North Africa, and in Palestine, especially on the eastern side of the Jordan, and the skulls that have been exhumed from them are skulls of men of the dolichocephalic or long-headed type.’ “ [supra, Parker, p.16ff]
Now, these are hardly the ends of the evidence available. However, it touches upon what has been noted by scholars. Mr. C.F. Parker has kindly taken the trouble to correct errors in scholarship. The physical identities of the Israelites have been established. Unfortunately, no amount of effort can make the willfully blind “see.”
Downnlaced, 2008.
