CRIME BEAT: ASSAULTS ON HOMESTEADERS IN OLD WEST

Catherine German

In this episode of Crime Beat  the reader is once again carried back to the Plains states and territories for a look at some of the people who made America a place of realised abundance. Pioneer life is by its very nature “tough.” Most of the European settlers were strong in their Christian faith, which often requires of its faithful long-suffering before blessings are bestowed upon them. For some Pilgrims it may seem that “hell on Earth” has to be endured and passed through. Some never receive their blessings in this life. Today’s story involve settlers who fall into the last two areas. The focus will be on the nightmare detour experienced by some “little women.” These are tales of horror.

Yet, the horrors experienced by these settlers fully equal anything experienced by those involved as victims in the Witchita Five murders, or any other of this sensational kind. Consider:

” ‘The golden sun was sinking…when we camped near a sandy creek bed….[F]ather dug a hole one or two feet deep [and] the water arose so that he dipped a bucketful for our use. Joanna and I gathered sticks for the camp fire. Sophia opened the coop and scattered grain for her chickens. Father and Stephen milked the cows, and we enjoyed the sweet, warm milk along with the supper mother had prepared!…’

“Thus wrote seventeen-year-old Catherine German describing what had become for her and her family, as well as countless others, the end of a typical day’s journey on the great road west…During the previous two weeks, Catherine’s family had passed slowly, yet steadily, through the settled regions of Kansas…When the Germans queried about hostiles, those who knew only laughed. None had been seen in years….

Catherine: ‘‘Soon all were up and dressed; we ate breakfast and broke camp at sunrise….Father took his rifle, as was his custom, and walked ahead of the wagon…

“‘I looked and saw about a dozen antelope that had crossed the road in front of our wagon. Just then I heard the most terrible yells. We looked again and saw many forms dashing down upon our wagon. Stephen exclaimed, ‘Indians! Indians!’ I heard several dreadful groans. A great fear took possession of me…I tried to follow brother. As the savages neared me an arrow struck my thigh. A big burly Indian jumped off his horse, grabbed me and pulled out the arrow. He kicked me several times; then put me on his large bay horse and rode to our wagon. There I saw sister Jane lying dead….Jane had jumped from the wagon with an axe and struck her assailant on the shoulder; then another Indian shot her….[F]ather was first to fall and mother ran to his aid and was the next victim…Her captor cruelly murdered her and she fell near father’s body.

” ‘Some time passed while the Indians were parleying; they seemed to make a choice between Joanna and myself….The Indians removed our bonnets to see if we had long hair….My hair was short…Joanna was sitting on a box that had been taken from the back of our wagon….We heard the report of a rifle and when we looked again, our beloved sister, Joanna, was dead. The Indians then scalped their long-haired victims….This all happened within a very short time, and before any of us could realize it, our once happy family life was forever ended.

“‘We sisters were taken on the ponies behind those who chose us,’ said Catherine German. Julia, age seven, and Addie five, were chosen by a squaw and her husband while ‘an average-sized buck’ claimed twelve-year-old Sophia.

“‘I, Catherine was taken by…a hard-hearted, brutal and cruel savage….Later, they found a few horses so Sophia and I were each put on one with old pack saddles, which were better than none at all. We were not allowed to sit sidewise on the horses and for several days some one led them. I wondered if they feared we might escape. How glad we would have been to do so but there was no opportunity.

“‘The large squaw, whom I called Big Squaw, seemed delighted to see us tortured or frightened. Once when I was roasting a piece of liver over the camp fire, Big Squaw snatched it from the stick which held it and ate it just before I had finished cooking it. Another day, a buck tried to make us eat raw meat and because we would not do so, he threw firebrand at us and would not let me come near to cook our meat. These Redskins often tried to frighten me by saying they were going to kill me. Sometimes I heard the threat and felt the muzzle of the gun against my back but I stood very still for I felt that death would be better than living a miserable life with them. I was very despondent and did not care really what happened to me.’

“When they finally neared the village, Catherine’s captors stopped, donned their finest dress, including feathered bonnets, then smeared on war paint.

“‘When all were ready, they mounted their bare-backed ponies. The savage Indian who captured me, considered me his personal trophy, so he took me on behind himself and made me understand that I must cling to him. Thus adorned as the leader, he was nearly ready to start. I saw Sophia mounted behind a young Indian buck. She seemed uneasy, wondering what they meant to do. An intense sadness came over me as I noticed they had divided dear mother’s and sister Jane’s scalp locks into five pieces to represent the number of persons they had killed in our family. These long-hair scalp locks were fastened to the ends of rifles and swung to the breeze….

“‘When all were ready the Indians mounted and set out at full speed, my captor and myself as leaders. On, on, we dashed for several miles and soon our ponies were a lather of sweat. Still onward we sped and it seemed that they must drop from exhaustion. We must have raced on for four or five miles until we entered an Indian village; without slacking speed, they raced through it yelling and firing revolvers into the air. Men, women and children, also barking dogs, took after us. The Indians grabbed at me from all side as we passed them. I wondered if they intended to tear me into pieces. They did tear my dress skirt into strips….

“‘Strange Indians gathered around until I was the center of a large crowd….[M]y face was dirty, hair disheveled and my gingham dress had been torn from my body….Every way I turned, I saw many pairs of black eyes fixed upon me.’

“Simply because they were claimed by one Indian did not necessarily shield a captive from others. Catherine German was compelled by her master to serve as tribal prostitute and the frail young woman quaked each time she was forced to fetch wood or water, for she was often raped as many as six times on a single trip. Additionally, jealous squaws bitter over the attention captives received often beat them mercilessly and forced them into backbreaking labor. Although a white woman was considered a prized piece of property, her child was not. Unlike their mothers, who could be used as laborers or sexual slaves, small children had no immediate value.

“Seen as little more than a burden, the two youngest German girls were set adrift on the prairie and left to die. After wandering for weeks, living on grass and berries, the starving children were eventually recaptured by the Indians and brought to camp...[Later] while her captors were encamped along the headwaters of the Brazos in Texas, Catherine German corked a message tightly inside a bottle and tossed it into the trickle of water.

“When all else was taken from them–their children, their virtue, their dignity–the captives had little else to cling to but hope.”    [SCALP DANCE, Thomas Goodrich, chapter 8, see: www.americanfreepress.net]

The Plains Indians certainly didn’t “invent” the system known as “prison labor,” but the reader may well note that the compelled labor by captives in a camp is a branch of the prison labor system most productively exploited in the U.S.S.R and the Peoples Republic of China in modern times. Certainly, the Plains Indians had at least an intuitive understanding of the basics: work incarcerated to death, discard, and replace with another. These people, mostly women and children, captured by Plains Indians, may well constitute America’s first significant “Missing In Action” population, if one reckons the wagons westward as commencing prior to the War Between The States. Yet no “state of war” against these Pilgrims could long prevail. The “sheep” were destined to regather and dominate.

Downnlaced, 2008.

CRIME BEAT: 19TH CENTURY: HORRORS ON THE PLAINS

17 year-old Catherine German forced to be tribal prostitute.

This is another installment of Crime Beat, which is a series inspired by the old “Crime” magazines in which gristly episodes from the ongoing “Life in America” experience were related. Usually today, the media put a “spin” on crime which is not “keyed” to actual occurences but is much to express the equality of criminal acts. This Doctrine of the Equality of Criminal Acts automatically excludes the possibility of disparate results. Hence, when crime statistics indicate disparities in the social categories of the perpetrators of criminal acts, the media and most “eggheads” look to “flaws” in the data’s interpretations. The Doctrine of the Equality of Criminal Acts was founded upon the General Theory of Material Equality, which is a fundamental principle of the Jewish Cabala. This fundamental theory rests on the proposition that there is an ultimate “sea of undifferentiated being” or “light,” which emanated in astral projections. These projections originally became “star stuff,” as Mr. Carl Sagan might describe it, and pierced the Void in a fantasia of illusional material (“there’s no there there” actually) of which Earth and its flora and fauna are part. Yet, despite appearances of “diversity,” everything is essentailly the same emanated “stuff.” Hence, the concept of diversity must be a snare, as diversity, if actual, would violate the General Theory of Material Equality. No materiality can be both the same and diverse, except in the minds of Jewish and Masonic intellectuals. There immediately arises the suspicion of ulterior motivation. And so it is in Crime statistics and media coverage of crime.

Be that as it may, crimes in the “boondocks” of wilderness America perpetrated against European settlers is a vanishing area of historical information. One day soon all such data may vanish from the public domain, leaving the world to contemplate “bloody deeds” alleged to have been committed by these seem settlers, as well as the U.S. Army, and a potpouri of “moutain men,” adventurers, miners, fugitives, outlaws and the like. Only the aboriginal people in lands into which Europeans entered to farm and produce goods are without “sin” in the minds of the congregations of Universalist-Equalitarianists, who serve us by enacting  governmental “policies” in the guise of Law and then ”judge” their constitutionality. This is know in Jewish circles as a “win-win” situation.

“‘With high-wrought hopes and pleasant anticipations of a romantic and delightful journey across the Plains,’ began Fanny Kelly’s account of her eagerly awaited journey to Idaho…Fanny, her husband, and their adopted child Mary, plus several others in the party, found themselves traveling through Wyoming in the heart of Indian country. And …the Oregon Trail was a heavily trod road…the Kellys were anxious about Indians. As Fanny explained, ‘At the outposts and ranches, we heard nothing but ridicule…At Horseshoe Creek, which we had just left, and where there was a telegraph station, our inquiries had elicited similar assurances as to the quiet and peaceful condition of the country through which we must pass. Being thus persuaded that fears were groundless, we entertained none.’

“Other than being young, attractive white women moving west by wagon, Fanny  [was] only moments away from hell on Earth [and]…about to experience the much-dreaded ‘fate worse than death.’

“‘The beauty of the sunset and the scenery around us filled our hearts with joy,’ recalled Fanny Kelly as she, Mary, and others joined in chorus, ‘Ho! for Idaho!’ We wended our way peacefully and cheerfully on.

“‘Without a sound…or a word of warning, the bluffs before us were covered with a party of about two hundred and fifty Indians…who soon uttered a wild war whoop and fired a signal volley of guns and revolvers into the air. This terrible and unexpected apparition came upon us with such startling swiftness that we had no time to think before the main body halted and sent out a part of their force, which circled us round….Recovering from the shock, our men instantly resolved on defense, and corralled the wagons. My husband was looked upon as a leader…[and] I entreated him to forebear and only attempt conciliation. ‘If you fire one shot,’ I said, ‘I feel sure you will seal our fate, as they seem to outnumber us ten to one, and will at once massacre all of us.’

“‘My husband advanced to meet the chief…[and] the savage leader immediately came toward him uttering the friendly words, ‘How! How!’…He at once struck himself on his breast, saying ‘Good Indian, me,’ and while pointing to those around him, he continued, ‘Heap good Indian, hunt buffalo and deer.’ He assured us of his utmost friendship for all white people. He shook hands while others crowed around our wagons, shaking us all by the hand over and over again…My husband came to me with words of cheer and hope, but oh! what a marked look of despair was upon his face, such as I had never seen before…[W]e allowed them to take whatever they desired, and offered them many presents besides….Our anxiety to conciliate them increased every moment, for the hope of help arriving from some quarter grew stronger as they dallied.

“‘They grew bolder and more insolent in their advances….

“‘[T]hey requested that we should prepare supper, which they said they would share with us, and then go to the hills to sleep. The men of our party concluded it best to give them a feast and Mr. Kelly gave orders…to prepare a large meal immediately…Supper, that they asked for, was in rapid progress of preparation, when suddenly…there was a simultaneous discharge of arms, and when the cloud of smoke cleared away, I could see the retreating form of Mr. Larimer and also the faltering motions of poor Mr. Wakefield, for he was mortally wounded. Mr. Kelly and Andy made a miraculous escape with their lives. Mr. Sharp was killed within a few feet of me. Mr. T?aylor—I can never forget his face as I saw him shot through the forehead with a rifle ball. He looked at me as he fell backward to the ground, a corpse.

“‘[T]he Indians quickly sprang into our wagons, tearing off covers, breaking, crushing, and smashing all hinderances to plunder…They filled the air with the fearful war whoops and hideous shouts…[T]wo of the most savage-looking of the party rushed up into my wagon with tomahawks drawn in their right hands, and with their left seized me by both hands and pulled me violently to the ground, injuring my limbs very severely, almost breaking them…I turned to my little Mary, who with outstretched hands, was standing in the wagon.’

“…Fanny Kelly found herself on a horse bound for an Indian village…‘I rode on in my helpless condition with my child clinging to me….In the darkness of our ride I conceived a plan for the escape of little Mary. I whispered in her childish ear, ‘Mary, we are only a few miles from our camp…Drop gently down and lie on the ground for a little while to avoid being seen; then retrace your steps, and may God in mercy go with you. If I can, I will follow you later’….Accordingly, watching for an opportunity, I too, slipped to the ground under the friendly cover of night, and the horse went on without its rider.

“‘My plan was not successful…Crouching in the undergrowth I might have escaped in the darkness were it not for their cunning. Forming a line of forty or fifty abreast, they actually covered the entire ground as they rode toward me. The horses…betrayed me when they were frightened at my crouching form….The Indians used great violence toward me, assuring me that if any further attempts were made to escape, my punishment would be accordingly. They then promised to send a party out in search of the child when it became light…’

“Nearly insane over the fate of her husband and Mary, desperate for want of water, Fanny again stood at death’s door on the third night of captivity when she accidentally broke her captor’s ‘peace’ pipe.

“The sun began to sink, and the chief was so enraged against me that he told me by signs that I should behold it rise no more. Grinding his teeth with wrathful anger he made me understand that I was not to be trusted; had once tried to escape; had made them suffer the loss of my child, and that my life would be the forfeit. A large fire had been built and they all danced around it. Night had begun to darken heavily over me and I stood trembling and horror-struck not knowing that the flame, which the savages capered about, was destined to consume my tortured form….An untamed horse was brought and they told me I would be placed on it as a target for their deadliest arrows, and the animal might then run at will, carrying my body where it would.

“‘Helpless and almost dying with terror at my situation, I sank on a rocky seat in their midst. They were all armed and anxiously awaited the signal. They had pistols, bows, and spears; and I noticed that some were ready to raise blazing firebrands to frighten the pawing beast that was to bear me to death….In an instant a lifetime of thought condensed itself into my mind….

“‘In what I almost felt to be my final breath…and remembering a purse of money which was in my pocket…I drew it out and divided it among them….One hundred and twenty dollars in notes I gave them, telling them its value as I did so, when, to my astonishment, a change came over their faces. They laid their weapons upon the ground, seemingly pleased, and very anxious to understand; then asking me to explain the worth of each note clearly by holding up my fingers. Eagerly I tried to obey…but my cold hands fell powerless by my side, my tongue refused to utter a sound, and…I sank to the ground.’

“A short time later Fanny again faced death when an enraged Indian tried to shoot her with an arrow. Finally, the weary woman’s suffering was assuaged somewhat when she was allowed water at a campsite, whereupon she quickly dropped down in sleep….

“‘I was aroused by a whistling sound, and, gathering myself up, looked fearfully around me,’ said the startled woman. ‘Two flaming eyes seemed to pierce the darkness like a sword. I shuddered and held my breath, as a long lithe serpent wound past me, trailing it’s shining length through the damp sand and moving slowly out of sight among the dripping vines. After that I slepi no more.’

“Terrible as captivity had been thus far, once the victim reached the village, bondage began in earnest. Fanny Kelly:

“‘I had read of…all the characters of romance and history, wherein the nature of the red man is enshrined in poetic beauty. The untutored nobility of soul, the brave generosity, the simple dignity untrammeled by the hollow conventionalities of civilized life, all rose mockingly before me, and the heroes of my youthful imagination passed through my mind in strange contrast with the flesh and blood realities….The stately Logan, the fearless Philip, the bold Black Hawk, the gentle Pocahomtas; how unlike the greedy, cunning, and cruel savages who had so ruthlessly torn me from my friends!’…

” Meanwhile, uncertain of Mary’s fate since the night she escaped, Fanny Kelly could only pray the child had somehow reached safety.

“‘ Onc day as I was pursuing what seemed to me an endless journey, an Indian rode up beside me, whom I did not remember to have seen before. At his saddle hung a bright and well-known little shawl, and onto the other side was suspended a child’s scalp of long, fair hair.

“‘As myeyes restedon the frightful sight, I trembled in my saddle and grasped the air for support. A blood-red cloud seemed to come between me and the outer world….I dropped from the saddle as if dead and rolled upon the ground at the horse’s feet.’

“One of the most horrifying moments of Fanny Kelly’s captivity was not a beating, burning, or rape:

“‘[W]hile the savages lingered in camp about the banks of the Yellowstone River…a large Mackinaw, or flatboat, was seen coming down the river. From their hiding places they watched its progress like a tiger waiting for his prey. At sundown, the unsuspecting travelers pushed their boat toward the shore to camp for the night. The party consisted of about twenty men, women, and children. Suspecting no danger, they left their arms in the boat.

“‘With a vicious yell, the savages set upon them, dealing death and destruction in rapid strokes. The defenseless emigrants made an attempt to rush to the boat for arms, but were cut off, and their bleeding bodies dashed into the river as fast as they were slain. Then followed the torture of the women and children.’

“The captives were lost in a trackless waste and surrounded by a mounted foe who knew every foot of ground. For them to even consider escape seemed madness…Because of the terrible beating she received after her first escape attempt, Fanny Kelly began writing pathetic pleas for help that were then placed where she prayed whites would pass….When the haggard woman heard that the red men were finally willing to exchange her for goods from Fort Sully, Dakota Territory, joy turned into horror upon learning the Indians planned to massacre the garrison as soon as the gates were open. Smuggling a message to the fort, Fanny courageously alerted the commander. When she finally was brought into the post, the gates were quickly closed behind her and Fanny at last was free.

“‘The day that Mrs. Kelly was brought into the fort was one of the coldest I ever esperienced,’ remembered an officer, ‘and she was very poorly clad, having scarcely anything to protect her person. Her limbs, hands and face were terribly frozen, and she was put in the hospital…where she remained for a long time.’

“Fanny Kelly: ‘During all this time no tidings had been received by me concerning my husband. But one day, a great commotion was occasioned in the fort by the announcement that the mail ambulance was on the way to the fort and would reach it in a few moments. An instant after, a soldier approached me saying: ‘Mrs. Kelly, I have news for you. Your husband is in the ambulance.’

“No person can have even a faint idea of the uncontrollable emotions which swept over me….For seven long months we had not beheld each other; the last time being on the terrible field of slaughter and death. His personal appearance, oh! how changed! His face was very pale and his brown hair was sprinkled with gray. His voice was alone unchanged. Then he called my name and it never sounded so sweet.’

“In spite of the abuse she had endured, Fanny tried to piece together her life. To a degree, she succeeded…”     [SCALP DANCE, Thomas Goodrich, excerpted from Ch.8, see: books, www.americanfreepress.net]

In this story of deceit and harm perpetrated against these pioneer settlers of the west America, the reader perceives the usual mayhem caused by armed strifing by peoples, but there is that other angle of wanton “wilding” against strangers on the road to the setting sun. Murders, aggravated assaults, sexual assaults, torture and sheer cruelty seem to be “par for the course.” Yet, there is another element to these stories of Indian mischief that is rarely spoken about in the bold terminology which is usually accorded slavery of, say, the African people in the American South. The enslavement of white women and children by Indians in the 19th century is the forgotten slavery of American history. As is customary amongst contemporary “eggheads,” the white victims are treated as the criminals. Ckearly, this is not the truth, as this Crime Beat episode demonstrates. The Indian peoples have never apologized to the white American people for this enslavement. There should be a monument on the Mall in Washington dedicated to these “forgotten victims.”

Downnlaced, 2008.

FYI: HOW TO EXPLOIT THE MAJORITY

This is our second look at how decentralized deceit can have a result that tends toward being a centralized and self-serving, group ”project.” What could cause groups to do such a thing? Its purpose must be to advance the group relative to a majority. When a series of events that are not coordinated, nor even known to others perpetrating similar events, nevertheless occurs within a scattered membership of a self-conscious group, there is reason to suspect that within that group a private educational conditioning occurs that tends to a group “perception” of its destiny and of the perils to that destiny. If that group is consciously “different,”  influential, and vociferous, it may decide that its best ploy is to pretend to be relentlessly hated, discriminated against, and “victimized” by violent, hateful members of the majority, or sometimes other minorities.

There also seems to be a real question whether America even has a “majority” anymore. There is a certain smug perception that “white people” are in the majority. For this reason minority groups are fond of ascribing something akin to “bullying” to this majotity, as well as insensitivity to the “needs” of one or more minority. Perenthetically, since white people have consistently shown weakness before the minorities which have dared to make demands, new minorities came or of the woodwork to declare themselves aggrieved, persecuted, and denied equal justice by the “majority” white people.

It has become a fairly lucrative game. In effect wealth and power are transferred from majority category to a batch of minorities. Yet, this transferral is itself improperly ascribed, as their are “minority groups” within the category, ”white people,” who are not much affected and, indeed, may benefit. For example, Jews may declared themselves to be white, or they may declare themselves to be nonwhite, as advantage & disadvantage are calculated. Freemasonry is composed mostly of “white people,” but they are the premier sponsors of all policies that “dovetail” with their watchwords: “Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity,” as well as their newest watchword, ”Tolerance.” Furthermore, white people can be divided further into Roman Catholic, Protestant, and “Other.” These may often be on opposite sides of issues. Classism itself divides whites into minorities branches. And many “white people” aren’t really “white people” but are a mixed category, which wishes to be labeled “white” or is so labeled by the Census Bureau. In short, the idea of a “white majority” is an illusion. It is truer to discribe the “white people” as a cluster of often antagonistic groups. The most salient thing that they have in common is their group “victimhood” at the hands of other, nonwhite groups, which treat them as an undifferentiated group.

Amid all this confusion–a confusion which would hardly even exist in a homogeneous society, minorities seize the opporttunity to exploit the “majority.” Consider:

“A 23-year old Jewish medical student arrested in Basel, Switzerland was described by police as the perpetrator of a campaign of virulent anti-Semitic graffiti, harassment and death threats. Police disclosed that PHILIP GOTCHEL, son of a prominent family, was solely responsible for the acts, which were called unprecedented in Switzerland. Most of the anti-Semitic acts were directed against fellow Jewish students, their families and their non-Jewish friends.”   [THE HOAXER PROJECT REPORT, 2nd printing (1991), Laird Wilcox, p.15]

What is striking about this is the level of education and social prominence involved found in the perpetrator. Jewish apologists may claim that he is “sick” and a “jew-hating Jew,” but he seems to be more like that Israeli doctor, Goldberg, as I recall, who slaughtered more than a score of muslims at a site on the Mount in Jerusalem. Incidentally, regardless of his name, that doctor is revered by groups in the Jewish state. But let’s continue with our look at aggrieved minorities in action.

“An Associated Press dispatch reported, ‘Vandals threw rocks through windows of eight Jewish-owned shops….Mayor EDWARD KOCH said the city would offer $10,000 reward…’ The Jewish Community Relations Council offered a $5000 reward as well. The windows were broken in the predominantly Orthodox Jewish areas of Boro Park and Flatbush in Brooklyn, NY. Around the nation newspapers reacted with shock and outrage and compared the incident to Kristallnacht, when Nazis terrorized Jews in pre-World War II Germany. Pressure from the Jewish Community brought increased police patrols and calls for greater vigilance against anti-Semitism. Within a month police had their man in custody. He was GARY DWORKIN, a 38 year-old Jewish resident of Boro Park. DWORKIN was charged with 14 counts, including felonies and misdemeanors. He was ordered to undergo psychiatric examination”    [supra, p.14]

Well, apparently Jews were victimized by yet another “sick” Jew. In this episode–and it does seem like an ongoing series, one observes the media at once loudly jumping on the “Jewish victims’ bandwagon.” Once again, Jews throughout the world  are given the opportunity to “play the ‘Holocaust’ card,” reminding the world’s nonJews of the peril to Jews and the need to provide them needed reassurances and protections, such as “Hate Crime” legislation. Then, elected officials of the Senators Kennedy and Biden sort leaped to frame such legislation in America, which so far have (thankfully) failed. But let’s hear another incident of Jewish fraud, shall we?

“Often, a false charge of anti-Semitism or racism is made because of values, opinions or beliefs expressed in a public forum. In the case of THOMAS SPEERS of Waterbury, CT, however, his expression of free speech landed him in court — and at the behest of the very host of the radio talk show he appeared on. SPEERS was arrested after radio talk show host JAY CLARK, who is Jewish, filed a complaint with police. Among the accusations made against SPEERS was that he was guilty of ‘Jew baiting’ because he frequently criticized Israel (sic). CLARK also testified that he frequently made personal attacks against SPEERS on the air. SPEERS contended that he was not anti-Semitic and that he was merely anti-Zionist and anti-Israel (sic). In ordering the acquittal of SPEERS Superior Court Judge ANTHONY V. DEMAYO, said, ‘What upsets me most about the state’s position is that the reason we are prosecuting this defendant is that his views differ so vehemently from those of the talk-show host.’ “     [suprs, p.21]

Besides that, what is upsetting to me is that the state got involved in this case to begin with. It is a clear indication of the Jewish communities ability to use federal and state prosecutors to initiate charges against people based essentially on the issue of “unlawful thoughts and words,” which is to say, ”thought crimes.” Why would attorneys for federal and state judicial offices consent to such prosecution? One reason is the hope of landing an enriching position as “partner” in a large, prominent law firm. There is an unspoken–or sotto voce, understanding that this prosecution will be interpreted as a “noble gesture” by a friend among the goyim. Such gestures can be professionally rewarding to a modestly paid govenment attorney. Many would leap at the opportunity. After all, they have to think of the “wife and kids,” don’t they?

Downnlaced, 2008.

FYI: JEWISH RUN “DEATHCAMPS”

Perhaps the least publicized atrocities in modern times are those which involve Jews. Occasionally an atrocity surfaces, such at Shatila in Lebanon, which causes some of the least obtuse residents of Western nations to express misgivings. The media quickly steps in to place the blame on Marionite Christians, and the matter sinks beneath the “River of No return,” as water under the bridge–never to be heard from again. The vast majority of “Christian” Protestants return to their Mammon-worship, as they continue their pilgrimages to Jews to bless them and in return to recieve their “goodies” for this piety.

Meanwhile, the Roman Catholics hierarchy lead their congregations to weeping “mea culpas” for their sins against Jews. When not flagellating themselves for “historical” transgressions against Jewry, they “see” images of Christ and the Virgin Mary on potato chips and on spots upon the fur of cats & dogs. “Christian” life goes on.

Yet, Jews are as bloody-handed as ”nations” vastly larger in terms of population. This is to be expected, really, as Esau was prophesied to “live by the sword.” Also, prophesied to be small in numbers, the sons of Esau have had to learn how to use “other people’s swords” (“OPS”) just as they learned to use “other people’s money” (“OPM”). Life can be “good” that way, if conscience is vestigial in a people.

For example, during the “Six Day War” the State of Israel (sic) had apparently plotted with the LBJ Presidency to concoct an “Egyptian” attack on an American warship, so as to provide a pretext to go to Congress for approval to retaliate asgainst Abdul Gamal Nasser’s Egypt (or perhaps simply immediately attack, going to Congress after the fact).

 As part of this plan, Israeli Defense Forces would attack the designated ship, sinking it to the bottom of the Mediterranean Sea and making sure that no U.S. Navy officers or sailors survived to tell the tale. Then, blame the Egyptians, counting on the shrill war-shrieks of the American media to” whip up” American citizen support for “bombing Egypt back to the pharoahs.” Naturally, the “flipside” of this was to be the loud alarums about “poor little Israel” and “our brother democracy” in a sea of despots

What the Jews and the LBJ Crowd did not reckon on was the incredible “fighting spirit” of the officers and sailors who manned the U.S.S. Liberty. These well-trained Navy men, recovering from the devastating intial topedo boat attacks of the Israelis, began to fight back. Hour after hour, sustaining terrific blows both from the israeli navy and airforce, they fought for their honor and their lives. Their calls for help to the Sixth Fleet Command were heard. The admiral in command of the Sixth Fleet (at that time permanently based in the Mediterranean Sea area) gave orders for Navy fighter-planes to go to the rescue of the U.S.S. Liberty.

This order was countermanded by LBJ and Secretary of Defense McNamara. LBJ is said to have made a comment to the effect: I don’t care how many men are lost. We are not going to embarrass an ally.

Heroism doesn’t produce miracles, but it sometimes gets results. The U.S.S. Liberty survived, even though the ship had just about been “totaled” by the Israelis, who had been able to murder 34 U.S. sailors and officers. The wounded officers and sailors were told in no uncertain terms to “shut up” about the “incident.” The Israelis expressed regret at the “accident.” Many of the families of the deceased sailors received money from the Israelis (which was no doubt paid for U.S. taxpayers).

For Roman Catholic and Protestant clergy, saying you are sorry for massacring 34 men on a bright, sunny day, while they labored under a huge American flag, makes the crime a “huggable” offense. ["Let's go bless the Jews!"] No wonder their churches tend to be half-full to empty!

Jews also murdered the unarmed family of the Russian Tsar, after first taking them prisoner and holding them at the Ekaterinburg estate. They were mostly women and children. LBJ and Secretary of Defense McNamara no doubt would have approved.

The Jewish Purple Gang of Detroit massacred several of the Irish Moran gangsters of Northside Chicago on St. Valentine’s Day. (The Moran gang included at least one prominent Jewish gangster.) This “hit” may have been done in conjunction with Murder Incorporated, which was another Jewish gangster group. They were what might be called “specialists.”

The point of all these incidents is to demonstrate the bloody ways of Jews and to demonstrate that this behavior is unchanged, whether the Jews are leaders of their state or leaders of a criminal gang.

We have touched upon Russia in regard to the Royal family, which was deposed. When the Jewish-led communist revolution took control, the “dictatorship” of the proletariat began to take shape. There commenced an immediate “purging” of much of the nonJewish middle class: intellectuals, Kulaks (prosperous farmers), professionals (including military) and police. This was arguably Marxist-Leninist-Trotskyists first experiment in “dumbing down” the population. (Later, in America and elsewhere, they would learn that a white public-school teacher, properly ”tweaked,” could be as deadly as an AK-47.)

It is estimated that 40 million Christians met an untimely end at the hands of the Jewish-run administration of the U.S.S.R. Jews not only ran the national government, the Communist Party, the intelligence agencies, and the secret police, they also ran the “gulag archipelago” of concentration camps. Most of those Russians consigned to these camps experienced horrifying deprivations and premature deaths. This is NOT to say that some were not murdered promptly, however.

Who were the “Founding Fathers” of the U.S.S.R.? In 1917 the revolutionary government was led by: Lenin, Trotsky, Kamenev, Sverdlov, Uritsky, Radek, and Litvinov. (Sounds almost like “W’s” administration in Washington–or Billy Jeff Clinton’s). Although Lenin was originally “billed” as a Russian (sort of like Madeleine Albright [of the Jewish Korbel family] and others of the last hundred years), he was a Yiddish-speaking Jew. After his death in 1924, a Jewish “triumvirate” shared power: Stalin, Kamenev and Sverdlov. In 1928 Stalin purged his “peers” and took control

Under Stalin the U.S.S.R went, according to the Trotskyites, “Bonapartist.” Thus, he represented a betrayal of the pristine version of Marxist theory approved by the Trotskyites. Nevertheless, he was in control and communist theorists within the U.S.S.R. tilted their interpretations in ways likely to keep their heads on their necks. Expediency may be denounced by communist theorists, but that doesn’t mean that they don’t employ it.

Stalin’s middle name is said to translate in his native Georgia (no! not in the U.S.): “little Jew.” His right-hand man was Kaganovich, who headed all Soviet Industries. His name indicates descendance from the Khazars, whose leader was called “chaghan, or kaghan” and which people converted to Judaism approximately 700-750 A.D. Therefore, Kaganovich may have been a scion of “aristocratic,” or even “royal,” blood. Surely he was born to leadership! Soon, the bloodlines of Stalin and Kaganovich would blend.

Besides Kaganovich, Stalin appointed L.P. Beria to head the U.S.S.R.’s secret police (whose name changed a number of times). It initially was called by its initials CHEKA, which is an abbreviation of “Vecheka,” which is itself an acronym for “All-Russian Extraordinary Committee to Combat Counter-Revolution and Sabotage.” By this name the reader infers how insecure and vigilant these usurpers were. That the Jewish-led revolution was shot-through with individuals who had assumed Russian-sounding names to block resistance to the usurpation by recognition of what the revolution really was: a Jewish “coup d’etat,” although Jewish support (Jacob Schiff, in America) and volunteers (the lower “East Side volunteers” of Trotsky’s) extended far beyond the Russian border.

The CHEKA was first headed by one “Felix Dzerzhinsky” from 1917-1918. He reappeared a number of times to head this organization or its “rebirths” under other names, such as GPU (part of NKVD), OGPU, GUGB (part of NKVD), NKVD, MGB, KI ( included MGB & GRU), MGB, MVD, and KGB. In all these name changes we perceive a reason why the U.S. military and civilian administrations developed a love for “letters,” as well as a reason for the constant “reorganization” of Executive branches of government, such as Homeland Security. For the same people who “took over” the governance of Russia also took over the governance of the U.S.A.

Whether Felix Dzerzhinsky was Jewish is not certainly known by this writer. He was born apparently in Poland of “landed” parents. Poland had one of the heaviest Jewish populations on earth at the time of his birth. His interest in “communism” is suggestive. Keep in mind that the important Jewish Zionist in the first half of the 19th century, Rabbi Samuel Wiseman, stated: “Judaism is communism; communism is Judaism.” The fact that he was “tight” with the Jewish Revolutionary Leadership, repeatedly serving them at various ministries, also is suggestive. The “birds of a feather” factor here may well extend beyond communist comradeship. My belief is that Felix Dzerzhinsky was a Jew. It is known that every head of the U.S.S.R.’s secret police, whatever it be named, was a Jew.

Parenthetically, one of the phenomenons of information today is the ability of Jews to hide the “jewishness” of many people and events. This ability includes textbooks, dictionaries, encyclopedias, et al. It’s easy today where nonJewish dogs have been trained to “put their tails between their legs” rather than simply speaking the facts or evidence of the matter. “What difference does it make?” they whimper. Servile to the end, they have selected their master and act accordingly.

According to Robert Conquest, considered by many the preeminent authority on this subject, in his book, The Great Terror, states that between 1937-1938 there were twelve million political prisoners. He further states that one million were legally executed, after appearing in the famed Stalinist court system to be “tried.” Two million others faced untimely deaths in the concentration camps, where a combination of exhaustion, starvation, cold and disease proved all too lethal. However, the massive “round up” began about 1930.

From the outset Lenin set the tone for life in the U.S.S.R.: “The state is an instrument for coercion…We want to organize violence in the name of the interest of the workers.” [early June, 1918] The workers did not state their desires; rather, their desires were stated by the communist leadership, based in part on Marxist theory about what SHOULD be their interests and in part on the practical requirements of continuing as “dictators of the proletariat.” In other words even the brutal Jewish leadership felt obliged to “schmooze” the workers.

 Incidentally, I believe that their correlatives in the U.S. did the same, sometimes in the name of “labor” and sometime in the name of “Negroes.” Later, they would proceed in the name of “women,” or of “Gays (homosexuals), or of ”persecuted Jews,” or of “Chicanos,” or of “Mexicans,” or of “Latinos,” or of “short people,” or of “handicapped” people, or of something else. The main thing was to create a need to employ state power against someone that Jews, Marxists, or allied groups felt “threatened them” by possession of some degree of independence from their “circle of rule.” Often, imbecilic doctrines of uniformitarianism served this purpose, such as “disparate results.” Incidentally, this doctrine was never and is not now applied to “top-heavy” Jewish participation at the controlling end of things.

The first head of the CHEKA, “Iron” Felix Dzerzhinsky made the aims of the communist leadership quite clear: “The public and the press misunderstand the character and tasks of our commission…We stand for organized terror–this should be frankly stated–terror being absolutely indispensable in current revolutionary conditions.”  Hence, the premeditated cruelties inflicted upon the mostly nonJewish masses of Russia. The “bourgeois mentality” had to be eliminated, being a transient cancer upon the body of the planned for ideal of a “Workers Paradise.”

As for the leadership of the secret service under Stalin, consider:

“Genrikh Yagoda became head of the GPU secret police in July 1934. Upon his removal on Dec. 30, 1936, the Jew M. Berman was briefly its head, followed by ‘the bloodthirsty dwarf’ Nikolai Yezhov, (he stood only 4′ 7″). All three would die in Stalin’s purges. On Dec. 8, 1938, the Jew, L.P. Beria, became head of the secret police. He seved until Stalin’s death on March 5, 1953. Beria was purged and executed by Khrushchev (also described as a Jew) a few months later.  [JEWISH-RUN CONCENTRATION CAMPS IN THE SOVIET UNIONS, Dr. Hermann Greife, Introduction, Dr. E. R. Fields, p.1]

Therefore, the stage was set for disaster for millions. Why? Consider:

“In November 1917, Jewish Marxism completely absorbed the ruling power of Russia.

“Its next step was to expand this power through the exploitation of the masses…It was comparatively easy to dispose of the leading and most valuable racial elements: the intelligentsia and nobility…But the most difficult problem was the handling of the peasants. Lenin, himself, had long ago recognized that the greatest obstacle in establishing a Communistic slave-state would be the strong and healthy peasant, consequently the government had but one alternative: the complete destruction of the healthy peasantry.

“Although the new rulers, ever since their rise to power, encountered a stiff opposition from the peasantry, their real drive to achieve their object commenced with the first Five Year Plan. It was to be a bloody, and in the history of mankind, a unique act.

“The entire independent peasantry, the so-called ‘Kulaks” were dispossessed of their possessions and driven from their farms.

“During this process of ‘raskulatchivanje’ or diskulakizing a great number were massacred on the spot…”    [supra, p.6]

It has been reported that on his death bed, Lenin had expressed regrets about the “sea of blood” which had been shed, stating that had he had ten men such as St. Francis of Assisi he might have succeeded. Whether there is any truth to this claim I cannot say. However, the sheer numbers of Kulaks must have caused some pause. Maybe there was a better way, may have been a thought that entered the minds of these grim Reds. Why not get some physical labor from these Kulaks in behalf of the Revolutionary Workers of the World’s leadership? Consider:

“The Kulaks were then gathered from all sections, dumped into box cars and transferred to remote places of the Soviet Union. Endlessly, these trains rolled through the steppes and snow-covered fields of Siberia. Uncountable was the number of men who never were to see their point of destination; they died on the way to the concentration camps, but millions reached their destinations nevertheless.

“Although these camps had already existed previously, they began to grow in importance and new ones were created as fast as the ‘living material’ rolled in.

“For millions of people, concentration camps have been nothing but transit points into eternity. Here the death of millions could not be accounted for as murder and moreover, these death-sacrificed victims of Jewish tyranny could be exploited to the last drop of blood in the interest of a ‘Socialistic State’ before being freed by the merciful reaper–death.”     [supra, p.7]

It is curious, also, to recall how much credibility is given by Jews and their “dogs” to the anecdotal “horror stories” in regard to Nazi “Death Camps”–even when implausible on their face–by “former inmates,” while anecdotal accounts of the U.S.S.R. concentration camps by former inmates–sometimes written on scraps of paper–is dismissed “out of hand” as unverified and nonevidential.

What were the basic reasons for the U.S.S.R. concentration camps? They were probably ones that shifted in weight as time went by in the revolutionary course. They may be listed, however, as chiefly three. Consider:

“1, The inconspicious extermination of the ‘undesirables,’

2. Exploitation of the physical power of the condemned,

3. The setting of an example for the entire population to suffocate any possible uprisings against the Jewish despotism.

“The first purpose is undoubtedly the most important, although the financial value of the working power of the compulsion workers is by no means underestimated by the Soviet government.”    [supra]

Nor by the People’s Republic of China, as well as a boatload of other such countries. Even the U.S. utilizes prison labor in its Unicor system. In the U.S. this is done in the guise of “training” inmates to be productive citizens. The latter aim is frustrated by the antiquated machinery inmates typically utilize and the fact that once released from prison, they will constantly find work applications inquiring if they have had a felony conviction, which is the case with most inmates. They are conditioned to a minimum wage existence while at prison by being paid ten cents an hour, or some similarly low pay. However, the federal authorities believe this approach will keep America “competitive” with our trading partners in the “world community.”

The experts who dream up such ideas are themselves paid hundreds of thousands of dollars, and even fedworkers get paid well at the “expert” level. No! Please don’t bring up disparity of results. Some people are more equal than others, doncha know?

Point three, above, may also be legitimately pondered as a precursor to the use of “hate crime” laws to keep certain folks solidly in power.

“The Jewish potentates of Russia [U.S.S.R.]: Firin, Chief of Concentration Camps; Jagoda, chief of the G.P.U.; Kaganowitch (sic), right man and father-in-law of dictator Joseph Stalin, and Kagan, Chief of construction in the Camps.”    [supra, p.10]

The men noted above, excepting Stalin, were gathered to observe the progress at the canal Wolga-Moskwa, which was being built by compulsion labor. There were a number of “projects” going on in the U.S.S.R., utilizing coerced labor. They got the work from most by using a “no work, no eat” rule. Of course, they never gave a moments’s thought to a fair reading of the Scriptural admonishment that a “laborer be worthy of his wage.” Normally, what they paid required no work. The key for these concentation, or work, camps was that the administrators were the only source of food. They were never generous nor just. Concentration officials in the Soviet Union were like that. But Consider:

“Eventually, there would be 53 large camps and 425 smaller camps…In connection with these facts, I shall refer to a letter written by an engineer who returned from the Soviet Union and who gives an indisputable opinion of the problem:

” ‘If one goes to the jail of Leningrad during the visiting hour, one will note a long queue of people standing there only to get information if their relatives in the jail are still among the living. In the majority of cases, these people are young women–the wives of workers, or old half-starved mothers who often wait six and eight hours patiently worrying over the fate of their relatives.

” ‘The information is always brief and harshly given by officials. The sentence in most cases calls for compulsion work or exile…Most of the prisoners, however, are sentenced to compulsion labor in the eternal Siberian north or to the hot and murderous deserts.

“‘ In the North they are chiefly used in stone quarries and for the construction of railroads, highways and fortifications–this is particularly true on the peninsula Kola. Furthermore, they are employed in industry where they perform valuable and cheap work…

“‘The consumption of this living material is very great and therefore has to be continually replenished. No worker will ever go voluntarily to these desolate northern regions and it is up to the Jewish-Bolshevik judges to care care of a continuous flow of supply to the compulsion camps of Kola and North-Carclia….’“       [supra, pp.9,11-12]

Todays enlightened Western leadership likes to employ people in self-consuming labor, such as war, so as to get the global population down to the “manageable” level of less than one billion humans. This is not to say that they have forgotten such useful lessons from the past as the construction in the U.S.S.R. of the White Sea Canal Project, which was to connect the White Sea with the Gulf of Finland. Consider:

“The main task was the construction of the stretch between the White Sea and the Onega Sea which lies between the 62nd and 65th latitudes. The climate in this region is exceptionally severe, the winters are long and cold. The nights are bright and a heavy snow blanket covers the land during the long winter.

“Geologically speaking, it is a moraine; a multitude of smaller and bigger lakes are scattered through the territory and giant rocks and boulders practically cover the entire surface. The subjacent layer is composed of extremely hard substance. Numerous rapids and natural dikes hinder traffic on the lakes.

“Big settlements are non-existent and immense distances lie between the few barren villages.

“Through this inhospitable region, the Soviet government decided to run the canal…”   [supra, p.34.)

Now, it is true that the U.S. has gone into the north of Alaska, in cooperation with the state authorities and private industry, to construct projects in severe weather conditions and terrain, nothing was anything other than well-paid work in as modern a set of facilities as could be had reasonably under the circumstances and utilizing the best of modern equipment. Had ANY of the Americans gone to work at the White Sea Canal Project, they wouldn't have ever returned alive. Consider:

"LIVING CONDITIONS: After their arrival, the prisoners had to march over partly impassable roads to their destination. Here they had to dig pits, erect tents or build barracks, where they were forced to live in absolute seclusion from the world...

"It was terribly cold there; and colder for those who hailed from the sunny South--they leave the transport shivering, tie rags over their mouths and tighten the blankets around their bodies--and freeze.

"Then there are those who have to sleep with the stars shining in their faces--the tents are crowded and the barracks not yet finished. No provisions to cook or prepare the distribution of rations; the food has to be consumed in its raw state...

"The suffering under this terrible cold is so great that the prisoners have but one dream: to sleep in the tunnels of the concrete dams where by chemical processes a slight warmth is made possible.

"The food rations are so scant that the physically stronger prisoners often rob their weaker co-sufferers. The distribution of food is always accompanied by quarrels, swearing and attempts to grab some of the precious morsels from a fellow-prisoner...

"The mortality in the camps is enormous on account of diseases. The prisoners are so lousy that regular slaughter houses had to be equipped where day by day in the bitter cold, sit imprisoned nuns from the  various former Russian convents and with the aid of tiny metallic sticks, destroy the lice and nits in the prisoners clothing. These White Sea lice are the object of many a legend."    [supra, pp.36-37]

This information is consistent with known health problems experienced in the Nazi work camps, or concentration camps. Being more advanced as a society, the Germans were able to provide their treatment facilities with modern equipment and employed the latest chemical treatment against lice infestation. As the war years progressed, Allied bombing missions eliminated necessary and sufficient humane treatment by the Germans, resulting in a devastating increase in typhus-related deaths.

It seems likely that when the invading Russians encountered these hygiene facilities, there were utterly ignorant of their use. The Germans used no nuns to kill the lice. The Russians were left to pursue their superstitions in regard to Germans and modern equipment. Later, Jewish propagandists were able to convince the world that these were “human gas chambers.” Shortly after, scores of millions of Jews were theorized as perishing in the chambers. The Germans owed these people’s relative reparations for their losses.

Let’s return to the horrifying White Sea Canal Project, shall we?

“The Work: Now the prisoners are divided into brigades of 25 to 30 men. Ten brigades comprise a phalanx, that is 250 to 300 men. Each phalanx is given a section where every brigade has to perform a peculiar task: digging, blasting, deforestation, etc.

“Then each worker is given an ‘urok‘ for the day and is required to complete it in the time allowed. In the quarry, for instance, this ‘urok’ is a large block of stone which he has to sever, crush, then load on the wheelbarrow and transfer away quite a distance.

“For an under nourished, poorly clad man who has to walk a long distance to and from work, it is a performance that lies very close to the border of the impossible. And then the equipment: a pick, a wheelbarrow and planks to form the driveways for the barrow–that’s all….

“And it was not easy to manage a normal ‘urok’…

” ‘The frozen ground would not yield. The ‘urok’ was so big that many thought they could never handle it. Midnight sun–blue snow, it snows and snows…mountains of snow have to be shovelled off the pit. Many men have landed in the isolator–having collapsed of exposure.’

“But the most inhuman task is the work in the icy water….‘For eighteen hours the prisoners stood emerged to the abdomen in the water and dragged boulders. We have been driven into the cold water even at nights. It was almost impossible to withstand the heavy current.’

“In the spring uncounted victims were claimed by the rapid streams…‘The canal was filling up with water that rose higher and higher as a warm wind blew over the land. The prisoners dropped the tools and ran panic-stricken…’

The lack of any technical equipment whatsoever and the absolute disregard of human life, resulted in innumerable accidents and just as many died during the construction of the Canal as had perished during the world war.

“The slightest negligence or failure on the part of the prisoners bring severe punishment. A common practice is to confine these neglecters to the ‘penal isolator’–a jail where specially harsh treatment is administered. They are literally set on starvation rations and tortured in every possible way.

“The chief of the ‘isolator’ was the Jew, Abraham Isaaksohn Rottenberg, well known by many police departments of the world and a much wanted criminal in countries where he practiced his crimes prior to the time that he became a Soviet official. This position on the Canal gave him ample opportunity to practice from experiences gained through a long criminal record.”    [supra, pp.39-40]

There may be reason found here to suppose that the Jewish “Law of Return” may first have been applied to access to the “Workers’ Paradise,” aka, the U.S.S.R. Also, Comrade Rottenberg may represent a Jewish type that surfaces regularly in Jewish instigated or influenced revolutions, such as the “Glorious Revolution,” the French Revolution, the Hungarian Revolution under Bela Kun in 1919, and others, including the 20th century struggle for America. But let’s get a list of the chief figures associated with the White Sea Canal Project.

“THE ALL-JEWISH GPU OFFICIALS WHO HEADED THE SWC CANAL PROJECT:

“Matwei Davidsohn Berman, chief of camp administration of the G.P.U.; Lazarus Josephsohn Kagan, chief of constructions; Simon Grigoretvitch Firin, chief of S.W.C. Camp; Jacob Davidsohn Rappoport, assistant to Kagan and Berman; Naftalij Aronsohn Frenkel, chief of work (superintendant); Grigorij Davidsohn Afanasjew, chief engineer; Samuel Kwazenskij, political instructor; Abraham Isaaksohn Rottenberg, chief of penal-isolators and leader of the atheistic section; Ginsburg, ca,mp physician; Brodsky, commander of the guards; Berensohn, Dorfman, Kagner, Augert–directors of the finance department of the G.P.U.” (all Jews).   [supra, p.36]

In all of the above the reader can easily infer the cruelty, brutality, deprivation, and sheer madness of it all. It seems that the asylum inmates finally created the world of their deranged dreams. Ordinary people are vulnerable to the horrors of madmen, because they cannot imagine that anyone would do what these people did, as a rather pedestrian event, one which should not raise any eyebrows.

Further, I suspect that this sort of thing aids many Jews in developing believable, although false, tells of horrors, perpetrated against the “poor, wretched, wandering Jews.” Films, TV programs and books can be filled with the horrible deeds which Jews have done but ascribed to others. The development of the fiction which is presented as nonfiction had its “golden age” in the two decades after World War II.

Before leaving this nightmare world, thre should be one more account of a human’s struggle with official madness. Consider:

“…Here follows the story of a Russo-German farmer, Rempel, who, as an eyewitness tells his own experiences:

“…one of them particularly aroused my pity. His face was frozen and black–the cheeks and nose were covered with pus and I had considerable difficulty in suppressing an abominable feeling. In spite of his wounds he was working in the cold wind. I asked him why he would not have himself treated in the hospital. He looked up in horror and replied in a timid and frightened voice: ‘Konzlagernyj,’ (sentenced to compulsion camp).

“‘The rough climate and extremely hard work left a pitiful imprint on the prisoners. Tired and bent they moved about. A certain amount of work (‘urok’, task) was given every day but it was necessary to work at least twelve hours to get this urok done. I was told that in the fall, 3000 prisoners were stuffed into one of the barracks and of this number only seventy-five survived, the rest of them died…’ “     [supra, p.13]

There are several stories of nightmarish existence, and women certainly weren’t spared, which might be offered. Yet, it is a truism that a blunt denial by Jews of their crimes herein is sufficient to restore them to the status to which they’ve grown accustomed in America:  Most admired people.

Downnlaced, 2008.