WHAT’S THAT?

Wendy and Ralph had gone to a very romantic movie. When it was over, they decided to go home and “try it.” Entering Wendy’s apartment, they proceeded excitedly to her bedroom. As they were disrobing, Wendy looked with trembling disappointment at Ralph, and said: “Wiggly worm is dead! It’s got rigor mortis.”

Ralph smiled comfortingly and reassuringly and said: “Oh, it ain’t dead, now!”

Moral: Everything that’s hard is not dead.

All rights reserved. Downnlaced, 2008.

FYI: SCIENCE, RADIOCARBON DATING AND DECEIT

Profile photograph of Egyptian Sphinx indicates disproportionately small head and advanced deteriation of body. The overall view suggests a resting cheetah as model.

In this post I’ll continue to report on the curious irregularities involved with the radiocarbon dating system involving C-14. Also, an effort will be made to compare it with other methods. Further, I mean to introduce some proposals which have been offered to reach and explain, at least partially, this dating problem. Mr. David Fry of Texas has covered this trail in his interesting and fruitful text, HEBREW SAGES OF ANCIENT EGYPT, of which I have a copy. Some of his data I intend to share, having obtained his approval years back. Please note: the views expressed as commentary are my views–not his.

Since the established scientific order bears a strong resemblance to rigid religious institutions, it resists all truly innovative explanations and cannot recognize seminal concepts, as its assumption is that such intellectual eruptions must be from within its Traditions. The established scientific order today is hardly different from the arbiters of the World Order at the time of Copernicus and Galilei. The “Politically Correct” movement also shields the scientific establishment from unwanted intellectual eruptions, such as occurred in the area of genes and intelligence, as well as elsewhere.

The “Ruling Circles” in America have established a vast “overhang” of quasi-authoritative figures, such as Larry King, to declare any and all ideas outside the desired parameters as “wacko,” and the like. They are crucially assisted by the public school teachers, who condition as many youngsters as possible into being “grassroots” Republicans or ”grassroots” Democrats, sports fanatics, and “Oprah watchers.” By force of their positions, they are signalling what are “suitable” viewpoints. What is not “suitable,” therefore, carries the sign of taboo: “Don’t go there.” In case anyone doesn’t get the message, the “Ruling Circles” have already begun the establishment of “Thought Police.”

As may well be inferred, downnlaced is not an establishment type. For that reason alone I would attempt to enter fact, evidence, probability and law onto the public “info” highway. However, I also like to present these matters as intellectual “points of light,” (to borrow an expression from the occult). The fact that I’m under siege from the entirety of the anti-Christic order confirms in my mind that I am doing the right thing. This being so, let’s proceed with radiocarbon dating and related matters.

“The earth’s biosphere permeates with microorganisms and their bi-products. S.J. Mattingly and L.A. Garza-Valdes,, of Texas University at San Antonio, have been studying the plastic-like biogenic varnishes covering all exposed surfaces. Unlike the phenomena causing C-14 testing to date too old, these coating cause artifacts to date too young. An example of this has now been confirmed on the Shroud of Turin where microscopic examination of some of the Shroud’s fibers revealed this varnish. This invalidates the C-14 test which reported the Shroud to be only 700 years old.”    [HEBREW SAGES OF ANCIENT EGYPT, F. David Fry, pp.132-133]

I doubt seriously if many people have been thoroughly acquainted with the data involving the Shroud of Turin, but it seems very important to the anti-Christic “Circles” to do anything in their power to discredit any and all evidence which may seem to affirm Biblical statements, especially the New Testament.

Parenthetically, one answer which such “Circles” have discovered is simply “deleting” undesirable sections of the Bible. It is a form of editing which might be dubbed, “The Bowdlerized Edition of Holy Scripture.” In the future, if publishing companies want their Bible texts to be stamped with a little “K” (and it may not be possible in the future to publish a book without the “K” stampmark), it had better be a “New Bowdlerized Version.” Be that as it may, let’s continue with our look at radiocarbon dating, shall we?

“The theoretical effect of the earth’s recent envelopment by a molecular cloud on the accuracy of carbon dating, encourages us to check the potential distortion caused by the ingestion of primordial carbon (carbon 13). [Isotopes of carbon 12 and 13 are stable while C-10, C-11, C-14, and C-15 are radioacrive.]

“Primordial carbon (C-13) comes from limestone and natural gas secreting up from the earth’s interior. Modern life forms that metabolize primordial rather than atmospheric carbon dioxide, with its cosmic-ray produced carbon-14, will appear extremely old when carbon dated. M. Grachevetal carbon dated flatworms and a sponge which had been fed bacteria collected from a thermal vent 420 meters deep in Lake Baikal. The apparent ages of these living organisms ranged from 6860 to 10,200 years. Therefore, when a creature ingests C-13 it will C-14 date as deceptively ancient.

“Even animals eating these apparently ancient life forms will take up their carbon 13 and, in effect, be drained of carbon 14. They would appear to age rapidly. Such false aging has actually been induced in the labratory with mice fed on brewer’s yeast grown in natural gas. These mice, living in cages at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, California, were carbon dated as being 13,000 years old, and were expected to attain a ripe old age of 35,000 in a few months. Researchers teach that C-13 does not endanger the dating in archaeology, but as K. Turteltaub, father of the Lazarus mice, says:

“‘We’ve joked about sprinkling them [the mice] around aechaeological sites just to confuse everyone.’

“Of course no one would be confused if C-13 does not endanger archaeological dating, but the professor admits the C-13 mice not only can but would confuse radiometric dating in an archaeological dig. [In practice that missing electron in C-13 is harder to detect than expected.]     [supra, p. 133]

One can sense a certain “put down” of archaeologists in this speculative jesting. Other branches of science may dismiiss archaeologists as a pompous bunch of pointmen for museums. There may even be a certain level of envy, due to the many Horror/Adventure movies that featured archaeologists favorably, such as The Mummy flicks, the Indiana Jones flicks, et al. Generally, Hollywood likes to portray the people in other branches of science as probable “madmen,” such as Dr. Jekyl, Dr. Frankenstein, Dr. Strangelove, Dr. Moreau, et al. Could Professor Turtelbaum be “acting out” in fantasy what might be described as “Hurt-Feelings Aggression Syndrome?” Food for thought.

“…Using cosmic-ray data, P.C. Frisch thinks that the solar system cruised through a matter-less void until historical times when the solar system entered an interstellar gas cloud. The cloud interacted with the solar wind affecting the geomagnetic field. There was likely a change in the cosmic-ray flux to affecting carbon-14 dating.”

This Frischian idea seems at odds with the uniformitarian belief that matter is scattered equally about the universe in an invisible form that retains some important remnant aspects of the Infinite All from which it emanated.

“Because geologists are rapidly replacing Lyle’s uniformitarianism with catastrophism in the theory of forming the earth;s geology. It is reasonable that geological upheavals and catastrophes would release vast amounts of C-13 into the environment. Indeed, due to depletion, the earlier the upheaval the greater the release of C-13. Consequently, the earlier the dated event the more exaggerated antiquity of its C-14 test date.

“To exaccerbate the traditional dating error we now are accumulating overwhelming evidence that the further back in time we go the more intense the variations in the Earth’s magnetic field. This increased magnetic flux severely stifled the amount of incoming cosmic rays to react with the ionosphere. This more than anything limited the production of atmospheric C-14, and subsequently this again exaggerated the antiquity of C-14 dated artifacts. As the magnetic field becomes more concentrated over the magnetic poles, the less C-14 would be in the atmosphere. This would cause C-14 dated artifacts to date older the closer it is to an ancient magnetic pole.

“This error is one reason early stonehenge samples date older than Egypt’s pyramids.”   [supra, pp.133-134]

Scientist, meaning well, disturb the Universe with half-understood gauges, meters and tests. Their efforts to understand how or why things behave the way they do is certainly not to be condemned nor mocked. Yet, all to often the public hears from popularizers of science, who have a political agenda. I suspect that such people make important contributions to the selection process for the most prestigious awards, such as the Nobel Prize recipients. “Lift up one’s own; cast down one’s enemies.” So it goes.

Downnlaced, 2008.

FYI: SCIENCE, C-14 AND DECEIT

Carving of glassblowers in everyday life in Egypt

In my initial post, I introduced the subject of “ditching” material relevant to the scientific project at hand, due to its inability to be subsumed into the preconditioned concepts, which had generated the project from the outset and had assumed the status of religious dogma. On the one hand the posted evidence indicated the profound difficulty which science has shown in “giving up” old parameters which they have employed for scores of years with seemingly satisfactory results. Scientists are like American voters who “say” by their deeds, “Why seek the best answer when a satisfactory one is at hand?”

In short mediocracy has been enshrined and declared “nonpareil” acchievements by the “Academic-Intellectual-Creative Complex.” This “lesson” is drilled into the mind-managed youth in the educational system, inspired by Masonic concepts and energized therefrom. The generally moronic youth then speak of “liberty, equality, fraternity and tolerance.” While “knocking down” alcoholic drinks, they muse about how we are all “basically one and the same.”

No wonder that material omission is the order of the day. The ruling circles of many nations have their respective legislators pass “laws” that outlaw any evidence that discredits the “Traditions of the Best and Brightest” in all fields of knowledge. Without doubt the United States of America and other Western nations are entering at this time a New Dark Age. Interestingly, in the Western European nations (and those nations populated by people derived from them), Dark Ages, or periods (including Great Depressions), are directly related to the prominence, or even hygemony, of Jewry, which has consistently faired well under such periods. Curiously, the European Renaissance was a negative event for Jewry.

It is these traditions that assure the Age of Disinformation in the West will be characterized by a formidable dominance. The time is at hand that questioning the concept of “Evolution” will carry a heavy fine and often “jail-time.” There are many such “concepts” which will malevolently emerge as the various legislatures rush to pass government “policies” incorporating the “Traditions.” Already, in Europe, questioning any part of the “Holocaust” claims results in fines and sentences of up to five years in prison. There are several German intellectuals doing time now in “Occupied Germany.” Conveniently, German judges state that the truth of the claims and evidence is irrelevant. If that doesn’t signal Dark Age, what does? The collapse of the economic conditions in each Western nation under the bondage of debt?

In my last post on this matter, the issue of Radioactive Carbon-dating was touched upon. This post will focus on C-!4. This is one of the “biggies” in developing “time charts.” Consider:

“C-14 is created when the reaction of cosmic rays with the ionosphere precipitates neutrons through the atmosphere. These neutrons react with nitrogen 14, creating C-14. Upon creation, C-14  starts to decay, and is today determined to have a half-life of approximately 5,568 years. Organic material assimilates C-14 at a constant rate, and, knowing what the level of C-14 in an object was before it died, scientist can measure the amount left and calculate its age since death. Apart from normal variations, C-14 stays at a constant level in today’s atmosphere.”     [HEBREW SAGES OF ANCIENT EGYPT, F. David Fry, p. 131]

Now, one of the problems which Mr. Fry notes is that in the nuclear weapons usage (including depleted uranium bullets, shells and missile heads (“DU”), nuclear weapons testing, nuclear energy facilities (especially those that have had “problems”) of modern times, and other “outlets,” the atmosphere has received significant amounts of radioactive material, which previous time periods did not. This man-made radioactive contribution has distorted all readings based on the idea of nuclear degeneration in nature. Be that as it may, let’s continue to consider this issue.

“When Willard F. Libby first discovered radiocarbon dating in 1947, archaeologists, and especially historians ignored it. They questioned its reliability, as it did not coincide with traditional historical dates of the artifacts being tested. The further back into history the C-14 researchers went, the larger the discrepancy became. C-14 dated artifacts too young.

“The original assumption on which C-14 dating was based is that its level in the atmosphere is the same at all times. Egyptologists and the carbon dating scientists were, therefore, in contradiction with each other. The Egyptologists and the archaeologists wouldn’t budge, and so the scientists were forced to reevaluate their findings. What the scientists needed, in order for C-14 dating to be accepted, was a method of calibrating it.”      [supra]

Already, the reader must sense “compromise” in the air. The possibility existed that both sides were wrong on the issue, but that possibility was never broached. Instead, manipulation of the data, or the tools employed to discover that data, was required. Being “practical Marxists,” the dialectic naturally “popped” into their collective heads. They would create a synthesis by which a New Order in science could be reached. Consider:

“The answer came in the form of tree ring dating, and the tree that was to accommodate this calibration was THE BRISTLECONE PINE. The twisted and alternating growth patterns of the bristlecone made it ideal to manipulate the counting of its growth arks.

“The bristlecone pine enabled scientists to develop a chronology to calibrate carbon dating and ‘adjust the clock.’ Unfortunately, the development of this chronology actually incorporated C-14 of many bristlecone layers. In other words, they used C-14 to calibrate C-14.”     [supra]

I am certain some of the readers are familiar with logic. However, for those who are not, this form of fallacious logic is termed “Begging the Question.” Many people are familiar with the term through its relentless misemployment by journalists, radio and TV reporters, and unlearned celebrities. When these people use this term, they use it to mean “leading question” or a question which cannot be fully responded to without answering an additional, related question. “Begging the Question” simply means answering a question by returning to the facts of the question itself. An example of this: “The Bible is the Word of God.” How do we know this? “God has said it.” Where? “In the Bible.” This is not to say anything in regard to the truth of the statement; it only states that the answered proof is based on itself, or the original proposition. Let’s continue with this important matter of science and C-14.

“Scientific integrity was ignored in favor of unanimity. Strangely, scientists were calibrating C-14 to read older, when in reality the readings should have been calibrated to read much younger. This was later verified when Accelerator Mass Spectrometry dating methods were invented. Then artifacts having C-14 dates of 28,000 years were giving AMS readings of only 2,400 years, and articles dating 70,000 C-14 years became only 4,100 years by AMS dating.”              [supra]

Again, I feel obliged to bring up old methods and new methods. The nature of American society in particular is to break into factions, like so many beads of mercury. The nature of egalitarianism is toward uniformity. The leaders in this policy area like to employ sloguns such as “Bring us together.” Hence, from their perspective the practical need is to construct a field that causes all the mercury to “come together.” Thus, by utilyzing funding resources adroitly, political leadership could influence the scientific community to “do the right thing” and “come together.” No more division in our scientific community, at least among those that wished to continue receiving funding for their projects. Hence, synthesis was needed once again. Or one side must be “deep-sixed.” But, let’s continue with our consideration of this issue, shall we?

“To make matters even worse for the establishment, it is now being discovered that volcanoes can pour hundreds of cubic miles of C-14 into the atmosphere. And this further dilutes the proportion of atmospheric C-14 (Radioactive Carbon). In turn this dilutes the amount of C-14 absorbed into living matter, causing it to read too old.

“Knowing volcanism was profuse during the Ice Ages, the vast accumulation of radiocarbon dates for the Ice Age has been compromised. This dilution of C-14 causes the Ice Age to date more remote to our time than it really was. Another anomaly to factor in is the apparent decrease in atmospheric C-14 toward the poles. Therefore, the closer one gets to either pole the older things will radiocarbon date.”      [supra p.132]

I believe that there is also a likelihood that all datings by radiocarbon methods for artifacts, dyes, etc., found in European caves are compromised. Hence, the age periods of so-called “neanderthals,” et al, are likely to be way off. It must also be noted that the religio-political forces behind this “speculation” are anti-Biblical and desperately seek any method to undermine Biblical credibility. It is always useful to consider the motivation of groups seeking to impose speculations as dogma.

“Also, there is the phenomenon that the closer in time to the Ice Age an artifact is tested, the more exaggerated its antiquity. This means that the accepted historical dates ascribed to ancient Egypt are excessive according to radiocarbon tests. But even these exaggerated radiocarbon dates are too old due to vulcanism. Therefore, there is double jeopardy: the further we retreat into antiquity toward the Ice Age the more exaggerated the C-14 test date.”     [supra]

All this being so, and scientists probably pressured from several angles, and from within themselves, too, the temptation to “fudge” a bit must have been noticable to them all. This being so, there is the temptation to expound a hybrid proposition, which satisfies few entirely but which they can “live with,” and then to anathematize all opposition. This process would also include its being included as “fact” in the educational system, as well as alluded to “as a given” by media reporters, journalists and commentators. The legislators and judges then seal all arguments in opposition for a hundred years, and the society embraces the proposition. “What’s truth got to do–got to do–got to do with it?”

Downnlaced, 2008.

FYI: SCIENCE & ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATING

Drawing of bellows worker in ancient Egypt

In modern Western society religious views among the college-going set, or, if you prefer, the “degreed” are generally weak, especially in Europe. In sharp contrast science is held in generally high esteem. Therefore, since the levers of power in all the Western sector of the “world community” are held by this presumably educated category, science must strongly influence their decisions. To these “administrators” it offers a real and clear way to prepare for the future, unencumbered by superstition. Are their science-based policies noted for their soundness?

Parenthetically, I include in this term “science” both the “hard” forms (chemistry, physics, et al) and the “soft” (economics, psychology, behaviorism, sociology, et al). Without doubt the hard sciences are the more respected of the two. The respect that is accorded to the soft sciences is mostly derived from its “form,” per se, which improperly suggests that its conclusions are as valid as any found in the hard sciences.

Let us, then, consider the issue of Carbon-14 Dating.

“We must come to understand that scientific and historical observations are riddled with subjective viewpoints. Unfortunately we have become a society of truth by consensus…In science, errors eventually become undetectable because the tools which test the theory are calibrated to the theory.

“An example of this is when Immanuel Velikovsky searched for Radio Carbon test dates on artifacts in Egypt’s New Kingdom. At first professors of the Department of Egyptian Antiquities at the British Museum and Curators of Egyptian Art in New York denied that any C14 tests had been done on New Kingdom artifacts.

“Later it was discovered that many such tests had been conducted, but the results were never published and much of the data destroyed. The Palestine Exploration Quarterly quotes Professor Brew, saying:

” ‘If a C-14 date supports our theories, we put it in the main text. If it does not entirely contradict them, we put it in a footnote. If it is completely out-of-date, we just drop it.’

“The common excuse for discarding the test results was that all the New Kingdom artifacts had been contaminated.”      [HEBREW SAGES OF ANCIENT EGYPT, F. David Fry, pp.129-130]

Once again, we discover The Moderns pontificating theories the parameters of which are not allowed challenge from concepts that will not fit, and all such evidence is placed on the accepted set of parameters (Procrustean Bed) and lopped off. But let’s continue now with our discussion, shall we?

“When Dr. David Baker interviewed Dr. Raney, of the University of Pennsylvania, [he] ask[ed] about this practice. [H]e replied:

“‘The dating of Egyptian history is one of the most controversial matters in the whole realm of Archaeology today. On the basis of Radiocarbon dating we have come up with a very serious difference of 600 years between the old chronology and the radiocarbon evidence. It seems to extend throughout Egyptian history, but the earlier dates are off even more than these recent ones.’

“Later Dr. Baker spoke with Elizabeth Ralph, director of the Radiocarbon Lab at the University of Pennsylvania. He writes:

“‘Miss Ralph insisted on the wide gap between the so-called archaeological dates of Egyptian history and those derived for radiocarbon materials. In almost every case the radiocarbon dates were significantly younger.’

One of the interesting aspects of this state of affairs is that it seems to be well enough understood by the “science community,” but they seem to be similar to a superstitious priesthood, closing ranks to protect their “mysteries” from the general public, less the masses lose “faith” in science. One might assume on previous evidence that any member of the public may be initiated into the “community of scientists,” but that those who are not initiated are viewed as “profane.” Be that as it may, let’s see a bit more expert opinion.

“Ten years later, in 1971, the British Museum again tested two New Kingdom samples. These samples were taken from Tutankhamon (King Tut), son of Pharaoh Akhetaton. The test results again showed the time discrepancy despite there being no possibility of contamination.

“The two C14 test samples gave dates of 846 B.C. and 899 B.C. Yet conventional historians all know that King Tut lived in the 14th century B.C.E.

“Again these test results were never published by the British Museum. Commenting on this Stan Vaninger says:

“‘The conventional chronology of ancient Egypt depends upon several very crucial dates determined by astronomical methods. The earliest of these (Sothis) dates is 1872 B.C., the 7th year of Sesostris III, fifth ruler of the Twelfth Dynasty in the Middle Kingdom. This date allows historians to calculate the reigns of all other rulers and to establish the date of the end of the Dynasty and of the Middle Kingdom (1786 B.C.). This later date is crucial and the famous Egyptologists Sir Alan Gardiner admitted that ‘to abandon 1786 B.C. as the year when Dynasty 12 ended would be to cast adrift from our only firm anchor.’

“Yet it is this very astronomical cyclic method, which is now being scientifically assaulted by C14 test results.”                   [Supra, pp.130-131]

Of course, the never mentioned human foible of vanity comes into play. A professor or scientist, having spent as much as 40 years studying and investigating in his field, may well feel a visceral need to reject challenging data, which calls into question a lifetime’s “established parameters.” There would seem to be something revolutionary about such challenges, and the targets of that revolution are virtually scientific dogma one has helped to establish. Does an old professor’s life’s work come to nothing? There is a tendency to defend the established order by those who built it. Further, anything is fair in love and war. Bearers of New Evidence must be willing to defend themselves at all times.

Downnlaced, 2008.

 

CRIME BEAT: RAPED BY TEEPEE SAVAGES

Plains Indian in Teepee Brooding.

This is another from our series on crimes. In this post I will take the reader back to the 19th century American Plains, which was still being settled or passed through by hopeful familes, who were overwhelmingly European in origins. The Crime Beat series is inspired by the old Crime magazines, which featured various interesting horrors that befell one or more luckless people. These articles may have offered a bit of titillation to the reader, but they also provided education, insight and suggestions for not “letting it happen” to you. In a dangerous world this info may save a life.

The era of the homesteaders, settlers and westward-ho migration may seem remote to many. However, it is good to look at strength, heroic efforts, practicality, and danger which accompanied these doings. This is especially true, as the contemporary educational system has attempted to place fault upon the heroes and to ennoble the savage villains.

Let us now consider a woman’s fate in those days:

“Almost immediately, the coveted white women were claimed by chiefs. ‘He forced me, by the most terrible threats and menaces, to yield my person to him,’  Lucinda Eubanks revealed. In a few weeks, when the chief grew tired of the young Nebraskan, he sold her to another named Two Face.

‘He did not treat me as a wife, but forced me to do all menial labor done by squaws, and he beat me terribly. Two Face traded me to Black Foot who treated me as his wife, and because I resisted him his squaws abused and ill-used me. Black Foot also beat me unmercifully, and the Indians generally treated me as though I was a dog….’

“‘The Indians were killing the whites all the time and running off their stock,’ Lucinda Eubanks added. ‘They would bring in the scalps of the whites and show them to me and laugh about it….’“     [SCALP DANCE, Thomas Goodrich, pp.124,125, see: www.americanfreepress.net]

Although the Indians repeatedly demonstrated cruelty and racism in their dealings with white people, they are presently assigned the role of ”Eternal Noble” by the “well-educated” American. It is a curious oftheld belief of contemporary white people that white people “hurt” and “exploit” other people, due to deep-seated racism and adherence to the Christian faith (!!). With friends like white people, white people are in no need of enemies.

Downnlaced, 2008.

FYI: HOW JEWISH BOY EVOLVED INTO TWO MEN

Little ghetto boy--was he gassed?

Sometimes motivation involving an event, curious or mundane, is not easily perceived by casual observers and outsiders. Sometimes motivation is limited, low and personal. At other times there is a grand vision for the future that impells people to act. In such cases rationalizing crime and destruction is made easier by the “grand vision,” which will bring wonderful things to all people. To arrive at such a “paradise,” some–hehmmm, people–no, no! Eggs!– must be broken. It’s for the general good, doncha know?

When the situation is enfolded in a wartime event, there are many counterfeit “reasons” which may be adduced to provide something akin to cause-n-effect purpose for whatever is being done. Ordinary people are accustomed to the simple: “He hit me, so I hit him” argument. To win over the people doesn’t take too much “brain-storming.” Propaganda in war is frequently psychological war against the enemy AND the locals, or “friendlies.” Folks, in the “Big Leagues” there are no permanent friends, especially among allies, who typically spy on each other. As for the people, they are necessary “pawns” deployed as the grand masters see fit.

One minor event that occurred during the early stages of World War II that nevertheless generated considerable interest and publicity involved a Jewish boy. The anti-German propagandists used this incident to create a bit of useful fiction presented as fact. Consider:

“Books and newspaper articles about the Holocaust–including even the front cover of the Anti-Defamation League’s anti-revisionist work, Hitler’s Apologists–frequently feature a photograph of a frightened young Jewish boy wearing a cap, his arms raised above his head as a German soldier holds him at gunpoint. He is touted as ‘one of many nameless victims of the concentration camps, gassed by the Nazis.’ The fact is that the little ghetto boy had been arrested for stealing and was later released, unharmed, to his parents. He survived the war to become a wealthy London doctor–Israel Rondel.

“But here’s the catch: Rondel and yet another self-proclaimed ‘Holocaust survivor’ fought over the ‘honor’ of being the widely pictured ‘little ghetto boy gassed by the Nazis.’ Dr. Tsvi C. Nussbaum, a New York ear, nose and throat specialist, also claimed that he was the boy in the picture. At any rate, The New York Times reported on May 28, 1982 that ’some individuals, convinced that the symbolic power of the picture would be diminished were the boy shown to have survived, refuse to consider [Nussbaum and Rondel's claims] at all.’”    [The Barnes Review, Jan./Feb.,2001,p.27, www.barnesreview,org]

I have a theory why the “boy wearing the cap” has now two claimants, many years after the fact. In this case there may be no fraud. I believe Jewish scientist will back me up. If the boy was indeed “gassed,” his essentially good nature could reincarnate–not into another thief, or worse; but it could transmigrate into a twained set of pre-med foetuses. The process of mitosis in reincarnated people is theorized to account for the huge population in India. Hence, the boy and his docs are easily explained.

Downnlaced, 2008.

FYI: THE MEDIA AND THE CRAFT OF DECEIT

Although many people suppose that news outlets such as television do their best to present “the whole truth,” this is far from the case, especially with major newspapers, network television, and local television in major urban centers in America. The reason that this is true is that these major news and entertainment outlets are propaganda centers, as well as diversions and sources of information. The issue is not blatant falsehood, but rather that there are areas into which these media complexes wish to lead the vast majority of people. Therefore, they are tendentious in their approach. This approach necessarily both requires and excuses material omissions in their reportage. They may be rather “slick” in defense of their approach, but it boils down to: The end justifies the means.

Americans are not a thoughtful people, as they do not wish to “waste time” reading widely and including pertinent material which will allow for a rounder viewpoint on given issues. Americans want to have fun and buy things. That is a determined people and a determined effort has wrought major changes in America in my lifetime. Change is not, in and of itself, “good.” Nor is it “bad.” It is simply a statement that the status quo ante no longer obtains. There has been a change into something else. It may be the Great Depression or it may be the Roaring Twenties. The nature of the change defines itself, according firstly to the mass of people and secondly to the Insiders, who may well have generated the change to begin with. [There are still important admirers of Hegel and the Dialectic Construct amongst the "ruling circles." 

Although Americans generally have no fixed ideas for a nation, speaking only slogans that seem somehow appropriate to any inquiry made, especially by "authorities," such as TV reporters and poll takers, the leadership in this country reflects the views of far more powerful circles, who have been active for several centuries in the West. They are messianic, trying to create a global government under their direction. Their success in "mind managing" Americans into accepting their vision broadly is testimony to their clever and determined approach.

The agents of these "ruling circles" are typically selected from a gaggle of prestigious schools. The education provided in these schools promote uniformity of thinking. When they gather in their councils and conferences, they are delighted to find so many others who "think the way I do." They are energized by the power of Minds United As One. High above them, the real insiders chuckle at their innocence: "They are so naive it's refreshing!"

In this post I plan to consider an unfortunately commonplace occurence within the Academic-Intellectual-Creative complex. This is a tale of an event on a famous TV series, involving Nazi "horrors." Consider:

"In 1981, Jack Glenn, director of the popular 1840s newsreel series, March of Time, died at age 76. His obituary distributed by the Associated Press (and published in the Bergen, New Jersey Sunday Record on February 15, 1981) let slip an amazing revelation. According to the obit:

"'As senior director for the popular movie house newsreel, he often created world events with actors and movie sets. One such news feature film, INSIDE NAZI GERMANY, made in 1938, included footage of a 'concentration camp' that was filmed on Staten Island with scores of New York City actors. Much of the film's footage was shot within the borders of the Third Reich by a freelance cameraman, but [Louis] Rochemont [Glenn's producer] felt that the film had been censored by German authorities and ordered Glenn to reenact widely reported Nazi camp atrocities.;

“So it was that the media itself was already ‘creating’ a Holocaust before the so-called atrocities had allegedly started happening. And millions of Americans watching the newsreels in their local theaters were convinced that they were seeing ‘the real thing.’ How many such images of ‘reality’ that we see on a regular basis are actually the creation of movie magicians?”      [The Barnes Review, Jan./Feb., 2001, p.69, www.barnesreview.org]

Once again, the fraud known as “the Holocaust,” is clearly decided upon by 1938, and supporting “data” is being produced for future use. There are several reasons to believe that it goes back at least to World War I. it’s real genesis is in the minds of rabbinic elements who desired a means of staging a “death and resurrection” miracle, whereby the Jewish people collectively will be perceived as the “Messiah.” The acceptance of this miracle would lead to a world conversion to the “Jewish Godhead,” resulting in a global union in which Jews practiced the Mosaic Law and nonJews practiced the Noahide Law. This is the Jews’ version of the Kingdom of Heaven on Earth. Jews will no more assent to the truth of this, than to the fraud of “the Holocaust,” however. Anyone possessing perception who reads Jewish literature by Jews and about them ftom nonJews (typically unfavorable) will be able to blend the history of Jews into present times with the many available interpretations of “the Law” to arrive at a similar conclusion. The Holocaust is a fraud. The reasons for that fraud (and the vicious attacks on any one who challenges it) MUST BE CRITICAL for our times.

Downnlaced, 2008.