FYI: SCIENCE, C-14 AND DECEIT
Carving of glassblowers in everyday life in Egypt
In my initial post, I introduced the subject of “ditching” material relevant to the scientific project at hand, due to its inability to be subsumed into the preconditioned concepts, which had generated the project from the outset and had assumed the status of religious dogma. On the one hand the posted evidence indicated the profound difficulty which science has shown in “giving up” old parameters which they have employed for scores of years with seemingly satisfactory results. Scientists are like American voters who “say” by their deeds, “Why seek the best answer when a satisfactory one is at hand?”
In short mediocracy has been enshrined and declared “nonpareil” acchievements by the “Academic-Intellectual-Creative Complex.” This “lesson” is drilled into the mind-managed youth in the educational system, inspired by Masonic concepts and energized therefrom. The generally moronic youth then speak of “liberty, equality, fraternity and tolerance.” While “knocking down” alcoholic drinks, they muse about how we are all “basically one and the same.”
No wonder that material omission is the order of the day. The ruling circles of many nations have their respective legislators pass “laws” that outlaw any evidence that discredits the “Traditions of the Best and Brightest” in all fields of knowledge. Without doubt the United States of America and other Western nations are entering at this time a New Dark Age. Interestingly, in the Western European nations (and those nations populated by people derived from them), Dark Ages, or periods (including Great Depressions), are directly related to the prominence, or even hygemony, of Jewry, which has consistently faired well under such periods. Curiously, the European Renaissance was a negative event for Jewry.
It is these traditions that assure the Age of Disinformation in the West will be characterized by a formidable dominance. The time is at hand that questioning the concept of “Evolution” will carry a heavy fine and often “jail-time.” There are many such “concepts” which will malevolently emerge as the various legislatures rush to pass government “policies” incorporating the “Traditions.” Already, in Europe, questioning any part of the “Holocaust” claims results in fines and sentences of up to five years in prison. There are several German intellectuals doing time now in “Occupied Germany.” Conveniently, German judges state that the truth of the claims and evidence is irrelevant. If that doesn’t signal Dark Age, what does? The collapse of the economic conditions in each Western nation under the bondage of debt?
In my last post on this matter, the issue of Radioactive Carbon-dating was touched upon. This post will focus on C-!4. This is one of the “biggies” in developing “time charts.” Consider:
“C-14 is created when the reaction of cosmic rays with the ionosphere precipitates neutrons through the atmosphere. These neutrons react with nitrogen 14, creating C-14. Upon creation, C-14 starts to decay, and is today determined to have a half-life of approximately 5,568 years. Organic material assimilates C-14 at a constant rate, and, knowing what the level of C-14 in an object was before it died, scientist can measure the amount left and calculate its age since death. Apart from normal variations, C-14 stays at a constant level in today’s atmosphere.” [HEBREW SAGES OF ANCIENT EGYPT, F. David Fry, p. 131]
Now, one of the problems which Mr. Fry notes is that in the nuclear weapons usage (including depleted uranium bullets, shells and missile heads (“DU”), nuclear weapons testing, nuclear energy facilities (especially those that have had “problems”) of modern times, and other “outlets,” the atmosphere has received significant amounts of radioactive material, which previous time periods did not. This man-made radioactive contribution has distorted all readings based on the idea of nuclear degeneration in nature. Be that as it may, let’s continue to consider this issue.
“When Willard F. Libby first discovered radiocarbon dating in 1947, archaeologists, and especially historians ignored it. They questioned its reliability, as it did not coincide with traditional historical dates of the artifacts being tested. The further back into history the C-14 researchers went, the larger the discrepancy became. C-14 dated artifacts too young.
“The original assumption on which C-14 dating was based is that its level in the atmosphere is the same at all times. Egyptologists and the carbon dating scientists were, therefore, in contradiction with each other. The Egyptologists and the archaeologists wouldn’t budge, and so the scientists were forced to reevaluate their findings. What the scientists needed, in order for C-14 dating to be accepted, was a method of calibrating it.” [supra]
Already, the reader must sense “compromise” in the air. The possibility existed that both sides were wrong on the issue, but that possibility was never broached. Instead, manipulation of the data, or the tools employed to discover that data, was required. Being “practical Marxists,” the dialectic naturally “popped” into their collective heads. They would create a synthesis by which a New Order in science could be reached. Consider:
“The answer came in the form of tree ring dating, and the tree that was to accommodate this calibration was THE BRISTLECONE PINE. The twisted and alternating growth patterns of the bristlecone made it ideal to manipulate the counting of its growth arks.
“The bristlecone pine enabled scientists to develop a chronology to calibrate carbon dating and ‘adjust the clock.’ Unfortunately, the development of this chronology actually incorporated C-14 of many bristlecone layers. In other words, they used C-14 to calibrate C-14.” [supra]
I am certain some of the readers are familiar with logic. However, for those who are not, this form of fallacious logic is termed “Begging the Question.” Many people are familiar with the term through its relentless misemployment by journalists, radio and TV reporters, and unlearned celebrities. When these people use this term, they use it to mean “leading question” or a question which cannot be fully responded to without answering an additional, related question. “Begging the Question” simply means answering a question by returning to the facts of the question itself. An example of this: “The Bible is the Word of God.” How do we know this? “God has said it.” Where? “In the Bible.” This is not to say anything in regard to the truth of the statement; it only states that the answered proof is based on itself, or the original proposition. Let’s continue with this important matter of science and C-14.
“Scientific integrity was ignored in favor of unanimity. Strangely, scientists were calibrating C-14 to read older, when in reality the readings should have been calibrated to read much younger. This was later verified when Accelerator Mass Spectrometry dating methods were invented. Then artifacts having C-14 dates of 28,000 years were giving AMS readings of only 2,400 years, and articles dating 70,000 C-14 years became only 4,100 years by AMS dating.” [supra]
Again, I feel obliged to bring up old methods and new methods. The nature of American society in particular is to break into factions, like so many beads of mercury. The nature of egalitarianism is toward uniformity. The leaders in this policy area like to employ sloguns such as “Bring us together.” Hence, from their perspective the practical need is to construct a field that causes all the mercury to “come together.” Thus, by utilyzing funding resources adroitly, political leadership could influence the scientific community to “do the right thing” and “come together.” No more division in our scientific community, at least among those that wished to continue receiving funding for their projects. Hence, synthesis was needed once again. Or one side must be “deep-sixed.” But, let’s continue with our consideration of this issue, shall we?
“To make matters even worse for the establishment, it is now being discovered that volcanoes can pour hundreds of cubic miles of C-14 into the atmosphere. And this further dilutes the proportion of atmospheric C-14 (Radioactive Carbon). In turn this dilutes the amount of C-14 absorbed into living matter, causing it to read too old.
“Knowing volcanism was profuse during the Ice Ages, the vast accumulation of radiocarbon dates for the Ice Age has been compromised. This dilution of C-14 causes the Ice Age to date more remote to our time than it really was. Another anomaly to factor in is the apparent decrease in atmospheric C-14 toward the poles. Therefore, the closer one gets to either pole the older things will radiocarbon date.” [supra p.132]
I believe that there is also a likelihood that all datings by radiocarbon methods for artifacts, dyes, etc., found in European caves are compromised. Hence, the age periods of so-called “neanderthals,” et al, are likely to be way off. It must also be noted that the religio-political forces behind this “speculation” are anti-Biblical and desperately seek any method to undermine Biblical credibility. It is always useful to consider the motivation of groups seeking to impose speculations as dogma.
“Also, there is the phenomenon that the closer in time to the Ice Age an artifact is tested, the more exaggerated its antiquity. This means that the accepted historical dates ascribed to ancient Egypt are excessive according to radiocarbon tests. But even these exaggerated radiocarbon dates are too old due to vulcanism. Therefore, there is double jeopardy: the further we retreat into antiquity toward the Ice Age the more exaggerated the C-14 test date.” [supra]
All this being so, and scientists probably pressured from several angles, and from within themselves, too, the temptation to “fudge” a bit must have been noticable to them all. This being so, there is the temptation to expound a hybrid proposition, which satisfies few entirely but which they can “live with,” and then to anathematize all opposition. This process would also include its being included as “fact” in the educational system, as well as alluded to “as a given” by media reporters, journalists and commentators. The legislators and judges then seal all arguments in opposition for a hundred years, and the society embraces the proposition. “What’s truth got to do–got to do–got to do with it?”
Downnlaced, 2008.
