CRIME BEAT: RAPE AND PERSECUTION IN FINLAND (AND AMERICA)

Finnish nationalist Henrik Holappa arrested in U.S.A.

Swedish rape-victim

This is another episode from our Crime Beat blog-magazine. For those new to Crime Beat, this blog-magazine is devoted to delving into interesting crime stories after the fashion of the old crime magazines. Hence, we may deal with an old crime story or one as recent as yesterday. The crime may have been solved, or it may be a “cold” case which has yet to be solved. The one common factor is that the crimes are interesting and educational. At Crime Beat it is felt that such stories have the ability to improve us all with a better understanding of our society here, as well as those abroad.

Today’s story involved a crime committed in a Scandinavian country. What makes it very interesting is that a Finn, who happened to be related to the story merely in the sense of propaganda, was arrested in America, which harassment in Finland had impelled him toward, as a new home in this “citadel of freedom.” Please consider:

“Henrik Holappa pointed out in posts on the Internet that white women in Scandinavia were coming under increasing assault from black immigrants. The Swedish woman (above) was the victim of a rape and beating by four Somalis….  

“However, in Finland, pointing out the race of the perpetrators is illegal – one can be charged with a ‘hate crime’ for doing so. When it looked like he might be prosecuted in Finland for his thoughts on immigration, Holappa came to the United States. The Finnish government, however, made the case a priority and demanded Holappa be returned to Finland. The U.S. willingly obliged.”     [AMERICAN FREE PRESS, June 8 & 15, 2009, page 13, article by James P. Tucker]

There can be no gainsaying the fact that Scandinavian countries have seen such a large immigrant population from North Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa that a new hybrid people is being born there. It is a story repeated in all western European countries. This “diversity” was not sought so much by the people as by elitist elements in each country.

One example of this trend that few know anything about is the massive immigration into Greece. Consider:

“Greek patriots are continuing to protest the massive invasion of illegal immigrants. Protests began during the secret Bilderberg meeting in Vouliagmeni, near Athens. Hundreds of thousands of immigrants from Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia illegally enter Greece every year. One million of Greece’s population of 11 million are black illegal immigrants.

“Native Greeks angrily object to changing its culture and population from peaceful whites to marauding, criminal blacks….

“‘In parallel with the urban violence in Greece, there was a resurgence in fringe IRA groups and violent riots in Sweden, France, Germany and Hungary,’ said Ioannis Michaletos, a specialist on southeastern European security issues with the Athens-based RIEAS think tank. He thinks rioting in other European countries and Greece are related.”  [AMERICAN FREE PRESS, June 8 & 15, 2009, page 13, article by James P. Tucker]

Crime Beat notes that this perspective of Mr. Michaletos is common in modern western Europe and must be based on numerous instances of factual crimes committed against the native populations, which population, at least initially, was welcoming toward the newcomers. It is the elitist leadership, who are often as alien to the native population as any of the new immigrants, who attempt to cover-up the immigrant transgressions by the classic misdirectional technique of accusing the victim of prejudice.

The Crime Beat view is that a crime is an objective event in which injury and/or loss of property occur to people who are victimized thereby. The Modernist barely considers the crime but rather focuses upon the perpetrator and how that perpetrator might be helped. Considerations of crime and punishment are thought “barbarous.” In the name of progress elitist leaders use the government power to punish those who protest criminal occurrrences.

With this in mind, Crime Beat now relates what happened to a Finn who protested crimes against white people, such as the hapless Swedish lass. This is a first person narrative. Please consider:

“For 87 days, I found myself incarcerated in a U.S. federal prison in Batavia, N.Y. at taxpayer expense, in a Security Housing Unit (SHU). SHUs were built to house the most dangerous inmates. I was classified as ‘high-security.’ I was placed in the SHU immediately on arriving there, 140 miles from my new home near Pittsburgh. The only way to contact others is during indoor recreation for 30 minutes a day.

“I never had trouble with fellow inmates. They were mostly non-whites. Most of the over 2 million inmates in America are non-white. Different races and sometimes nationalities for gangs and set up their own ‘turf’ areas inside the prison – just like on the streets.

“I was the only white man in the SHU, but I was treated by the white guards just like any other inmate, sometimes even more harshly. But I am what I am, pro-white, and I represent my views honestly. I did not whine and did not demand special treatment. I did my time like everybody else, and I continued my voyage through life. The other inmates, having no idea of my supposed ‘crime,’ nicknamed me ‘Trooper.’

“At the end of April I canceled my legal application for political asylum, which was only a way for me to stay a little bit longer in the United States because my tourist visa was valid for only 90 days. My decision came after the top Finnish prosecutor, Mika Illman, decided not to press charges against me in the so-called ‘aggravated defamation’ case he was planning and which was largely reported by the local newspaper, Kaleva, here in Oulu, Finland, by Elina Ursin, a Finnish journalist, on January 17, 2007. The police investigation confirmed that I had committed no crimes.

“Because of my decision to end my asylum petition, the warrant for my deportation by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, signed by the special agent in charge, Kalias Muhammad, came into force. From this moment the period of ‘information blackout’ started, because the Homeland Security refused to give me any information whatsoever about my deportation – claiming it was a matter of ‘national security.’ My lawyer only obtained the information that I would be deported ‘within two weeks.’ According to Homeland Security, my deportation would not be any different from the way those held captive at Guantanamo are deported back to their own countries….

“While I was in the concrete cell, waiting for my removal, the facility director asked if I knew why I was placed in the SHU. We had a short conversation, and his last words were: ‘You are a very controversial person for some people … but not for me,’ and then he turned and left. I wonder how many white men, like the three who arrested me in March, agree with my views but they ‘obey orders.’

“Three anti-terrorist agents then brought me to the Buffalo International Airport. I was handcuffed the entire time. From Buffalo I was flown, in the company of these three gentlemen, to JFK International Airport in New York City. At JFK, two security agents from Homeland Security were waiting for me, including Muhammad, who had ordered my deportation. I had to wait another five hours after that for my flight back to Helsinki, Finland, and I was guarded all the time by those five anti-terrorist agents.

“Finally when the flight arrived, I was escorted to the plane as a ’special escort.’ Three security agents flew with me to Finland, because it was a ‘necessary security measure’ and the Obama administration had a ’special interest’ in me….

“Three months in absolute news silence and in isolation from other living creatures did end, and it turned out quite well. During the last three months the activists of the Finnish Resistance Movement have become hardened and I have become hardened. My arrest did not lead to the failure or collapse of our movement, which was the delusional hope of the pro-Israeli moderate nationalists in Finland. Conversely, the young movement has grown rapidly and it was decided to face whatever stands in its path — and whatever the movement faces, it will survive it.”              [AMERICAN FREE PRESS, June 8 & 15, 2009, page 13, article by James P. Tucker]

This story is unusual for Crime Beat blog-magazine, as it doesn’t really focus on a specific violent, horrific crime in the normal sense. Certainly Crime Beat alluded to and gave evidence by means of photograph of the crimes now raining upon Scandinavia and western Europe. Yet, our thrust today was in the direction of the new emerging crimes committed by the State apparatus against one man, or a small group. It is political crimes that Crime Beat chose to focus upon. We think that this will become the new and primary interest of Fedcopdom, dutifully obeying the gathering legislation on a spectrum of such political (and partisan) concerns. Crime, as is understood by Crime Beat and the old crime magazines upon which it tried to model itself, will be strictly the province of under-funded local police, while public money will be generously spent to “nab” folks who say things that offend a new caste system of social arbiters.

Downnlaced, 2009

CRIME BEAT: MURDER & MAYHEM IN OHIO

Anthony Cook - Hell's chef!

This episode of Crime Beat will focus on a remarkably violent individual whose career in crime was “topped off” with one of the worst series of “hate crimes” ever ignored by the major media. However, at Crime Beat this is the very heart of our focus. Based as we are on the old “crime magazine” format, we look for instructive cases which have happened in America, so that we may make our people wiser and less imperiled. “A word to the wise,” ’tis said, may save many from suffering what the victims of our story today suffered.

A caveat: the story herein related is factual. It isn’t fiction. It is as real as the official records of the police departments. This is the promise we make to our readers. No hype! We present the facts.

Consider the damage that a dysfunctional member of society can inflict.

It all began in 1968. Anthony Cook used a pistol to rob a man of $100. Eight days later he beat a 61-year-old woman and stole $250 from her purse. He was arrested and sentenced from 10 to 25 years in prison.

In 1973 Anthony Cook was paroled. He soon robbed two more people at gun point and was again sentenced from 10 to 25 years.

In 1979 Cook was paroled again. His sister, Cecilia Cook, says that he complained that White prison guards had mistreated him and told her: “The black man deserves what he can get from the White man because he is the f_ _  _ enemy.”

Over the next three years Anthony would murder nine Whites and rape seven White women – sometimes enlisting his younger brother Nathaniel.

May 14, 1980, Tom Gordon and Sandy Podgorski were sitting in his car parked in front of her home.  Suddenly, the window on the passenger side was smashed with the barrel of a gun. Anthony and Nathaniel ordered the young couple into the back seat.

They stopped along Raab Rd. and ordered [Gordon] out. Sandy heard a shot and Tom cried out, “Oh, God.”

Here are Sandy’s words: “The brothers took turns raping me. Then Anthony said, ‘What are we going to do with this White bitch?’ I didn’t look at them. I just shut my eyes. He then began stabbing me.”

Anthony stabbed her seven times with a carpenter’s awl. She pretended to be dead. The brothers abandoned the car in North Toledo and fled into the night. She crawled out and screamed for help.

December 20, 1980. Just five days before Christmas Vicky Small’s car stalled. Anthony pulled up and offered to drive her home. Instead, he drove to Ottawa Park where he raped her. He let her redress and then blindfolded her with a scarf. He then callously shot her in her chest and head.

Jan. 17, 1981. Connie Sue Thompson’s frozen body was found in a ditch off Langenderfer Rd. The brothers had raped, beat, choked and then stabbed her 43 times.

Feb. 21, 1981. Little Dawn Renee Backes, age 12, a seventh grader at Gesu School vanished. The Cook brothers raped, beat and crushed her skull with a cinder block in the basement of the State Theater.

March 27, 1981. Just one month later, Denise Siotkowski, 21, and Scott Moulton, 21, were sitting in a car outside her apartment. Anthony Cook, acting alone, pulled a gun on the two grocery store employees. He forced them to drive to a secluded area and bound Moulton with his own belt. After forcing him into the trunk of the car, he raped Denise.

Anthony then crammed her into the trunk and emptied his gun into the pair. He locked the trunk and walked away. The police discovered the bodies a week later.

August 2, 1981. Daryle Cole and Stacy Balonek, both 21, were engaged. Anthony Cook spotted them sitting in a car. At gunpoint he forced them to drive to the railroad tracks at the Central Ave. overpass. There he bound Cole and raped Stacy.

To throw the police off his trail he changed his method of murder. Both were brutally beaten with a baseball bat.

Sept. 18, 1981. Leslie Sawicki and her boyfriend, Todd Sabo, were sitting in his car outside her home. Anthony Cook walked up and pointed a gun at them. Sabo got out and fought with him while Leslie began screaming for help. Her father, Peter Sawicki, 43, ran out and was fatally shot in the neck. Sabo was also shot in the neck and shoulder. The couple was able to identify Anthony from police photos and he was arrested and sentenced to 15 years to life.

For years afterwards the police suspected Anthony Cook in the other murders. Seventeen years later, on Feb. 11, 1998 they were able to make a DNA connection. On Feb. 11, 1998 they visited Miss Podgorski and she identified Nathaniel Cook. The brothers were charged with the murder of Tom Gordon.

Due to the age of the case a deal was cut with the cold-blooded killers. They would agree to confess and tell what they knew about each murder. In turn, Anthony accepted life in prison without parole with his brother Nathaniel being paroled on Feb. 13, 2018.

Detective Tom Ross said that the confessions were cold and shocking. He said that Anthony was proud of the way in which he stalked his victims. Ross added:

“Anthony was filled with hatred and violence. He laughed when describing how one girl was worried about what they would do with her car. He said: ‘What difference did it make when she was going to die anyway?’”

That these  were “hate crimes” goes without argument, it would seem. Responsible voices in the media are very few, so that murders and rapes of white people aren’t usually framed as “hate crimes.” Had Anthony Cook not been so filled with hatred of white people, he might not have even gotten into a serious criminal lifestyle. Sadly – and foolishly – many people will blame white people for “making” Anthony Cook hate them.

Crime Beat must state a strong objection to the release of prisoners who are known to harbor such deep hatred of another race. In such cases “prisoners of hate,” when released from prison, are still incarcerated by their own hatreds. They judge individuals not according to character and deeds but according to a complex of racial features that, in total, comes to mean enemy. All too often, their wrong-headed views make them “hanging judges” toward people whose chief offense is being born into another race. Prison institutions have socially and psychologically-trained employees who are paid to perceive and help those in need. Why can’t they do it?

If a sentence has run its course, then must a dangerous individual be released? Why can’t Anthony Cook-types be transferred to a mental institution at the end of their sentences, and be restrained in such institution until their mental aberrations are favorably resolved?

Sadly, the chief argument against such “extra mile” rehabilitation efforts is that it would be used against political opponents.

Downnlaced, 2009.

CRIME BEAT: RETARDED GIRL GANG-RAPED BY 25 PUNKS

Four of the twenty-five villains.

This is another installment of our Crime Beat blog. As our readers are aware, we have modeled our blog on the old “crime magazine format,” where particular crimes are focused upon. The crimes which we treat are nightmarish ones for the victims and loved ones. Although there is an inevitable degree of sensationalism in relating these events, we at Crime Beat feel that they serve as an educational tool and as a cathartic tool. Finally, they serve as a means of showing respect to the victims whose suffering should not go unnoticed. They deserve that the truth of their ordeal be made known. For us silence is not is not an option.

Todays case is so shocking that the cries of outrage by members of the Academic-Intellectual-Creative Complex to protect the young perpetrators must not prevail. The silence of the great media complexes in the face of such heinous crimes must not become the model of decent folks across this great land. Therefore, consider this story carefully.

A mentally disabled 13 year old black girl was riding her bicycle to a friend’s house. She was stopped by a youth who enticed her to go with him into one of the Forrest Creek Apartments. There she was thrown onto a bed and raped by four men. She was then taken to an empty apartment where they rounded up their friends and a 15 hour orgy [began].

It continued over the evening hours of Oct. 14, as more and more men came into the room taking turns raping her. Finally it ended in the afternoon of Oct. 15. Even after they finished with the child they still would not let her go. Some would return later to rape her again!

Marietta detective Brody Staud said: “This is the most barbaric crime I have ever encountered.”

Cobb County DA, Pat Head, revealed that one of the blacks made a video tape of the rapes. One of the rapists was only age 12, while others ranged in ages of 13, 14, 15, up to 27. In their first court appearance some were laughing and giving one another ”high-fives.” They are charged with rape and child molestation….

The victim must now face the chance of coming down with venereal disease or even AIDS…. [THE TRUTH AT LAST, Issue No. 425, page8]

Crime Beat has repeatedly witnessed “negative group behavior,” as individuals lose all moral restraints within the “power idioms” of a gang. Predators prey on the young, the old, and the injured and sick. A mentally-challenged thirteen year girl-child must have seemed a “natural” to human beasts. It is said that the “world is a jungle.” En garde!

Downnlaced, 2009.